AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
1,395 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Perry v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama · Alabama · Aug 3, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's TRO motion included fabricated case citations and authorities; the court recorded the Commissioner's objection and warned the plaintiff against future fabricated citations. || Misrepresented: Other | Plaintiff's filings contained misrepresentations of authorities or record materials referenced by the Commissioner; the court admonished the plaintiff for such misrepresentations and reiterated prior warning from another court.
Judges: Anna Marie Manasco
AI-related case
Bisher v. Civic, et al.
SC Pennsylvania · Jurisdiction not recorded · Aug 3, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants' brief cited a case that does not exist (identified by the court as a fabricated authority). || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants cited another non-existent authority in their brief; the court flagged it as fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants cited a non-existent case in support of their rule that summary judgment may not be entered where discovery is incomplete.
Judges:
AI-related case
Damon Forney v. Township of Cary, North Carolina
E.D. North Carolina · Jurisdiction not recorded · Aug 3, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Response relied on a wrongly cited In re S.L.L.; the citation provided did not locate the case and the authorities at those citations did not address service of process. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel quoted only the first half of a paragraph from Armco, omitting the portion emphasizing that service rules must be followed, producing a misleading impression of the precedent.
Judges:
Adverse Costs Order; Bar ReferralAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗ AI-related case
Moore v. Aldridge Pite LLP
W.D. Texas · Jurisdiction not recorded · Aug 3, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiffs mischaracterized case holdings and misstated legal propositions repeatedly across filings, leading to misleading presentations of authority. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs repeatedly attributed quotations to multiple judicial decisions where the quoted language does not appear; the Court found these to be invented quotations. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited authority and case law that did not support their propositions, including at least some citations that the Court found to be fabricated or nonsupportive.
Judges:
AI-related case
Natashah Al-Ali v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Michigan · Jul 31, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Cottman Transmission Sys., Inc. v. Metro. Pontiac GMC, Inc., 351 F. Supp. 2d 343, 347 (E.D. Pa. 2004)"; Court could not find such a case and noted the volume/citation actually refers to a different case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "McMahon v. RMS Electronics, Inc., 951 F. Supp. 923, 925 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)"; Court could not locate that decision and noted the cited reporter page corresponds to an unrelated case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Brown v. ITT Consumer Fin. Corp., 211 F.3d 1217, 1222 (11th Cir. 2000) for a proposition; Court found the case (or other cited real cases) do not stand for the asserted proposition (misattribution). || False Quotes: Legal Norm | Plaintiff quoted 9 U.S.C. § 5 inaccurately in her filings; Court identified the statutory quote as inaccurate.
Judges: Judith Ellen Levy
AI-related case
Fernando Justino Santana v. Shook Hardy & Bacon, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · New York · Jul 31, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition brief contained citations and quoted authority that Defendants say do not exist; Court noted these appear to be fabricated case citations likely from AI.
Judges: Ronnie Abrams
AI-related case
TOV Realty, LLC v. Suarez; Kosel Equity, LLC v. MacGregor
SC Connecticut · Jurisdiction not recorded · Jul 31, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | ChatGPT added new case citations or altered existing citations in draft applications and briefs, resulting in approximately seven erroneous and unverified case citations in filings.
Judges:
6 hours CLE; Monetary FineAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗ AI-related case
Kevin Dale Higgins v. The State of Texas
Texas 12th Court of Appeals · Texas · Jul 31, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense counsel submitted a written memorandum that the trial judge said misstated holdings of several cases; counsel admitted the memorandum was produced by AI and he had not read the cited cases.
Judges: Brian Hoyle, James T. Worthen
AI-related case
The JAAW Group, LLC
GAO · Jurisdiction not recorded · Jul 31, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Protester cited 'Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001)' for solicitation ambiguity, but that case addresses contractor responsibility and was irrelevant to the argument; protester withdrew the citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'Tyco Electronics Corp., B-411937, Nov. 9, 2015' which GAO and the agency were unable to locate; protester later withdrew the citation and acknowledged it did not correspond to a published GAO decision.
Judges:
