AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 691 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
814 judge-case associations across 549 judges and 187 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
691Cases
814Judge-case associations
549Judges
187Courts
691 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Sherwood v. County of Botetourt, Virginia, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia · Virginia · May 20, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs repeatedly cited a non-existent opinion 'Peal v. Commonwealth' as supporting a foundational probable-cause requirement; court found the case does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Ford v. City of Alexandr…
Judges: Michael Francis Urbanski
AI-related case
Chakma v. Sushi Katsuei, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · New York · May 19, 2026
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Defense Counsel cited a non-sourced authority "§ 3.01 Certification Is Crucial Step In Class Actions," which the Court found resulted from AI hallucination and lacked any identifiable source. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense…
Judges: Katherine Polk Failla
AI-related case
REDACTED v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon · Oregon · May 19, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel's Suggested Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (ECF No. 34) contained fabricated case citation(s); the Court allowed an amended filing (ECF No. 40). || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel's Response to Plaintiff's Objections (EC…
Judges: Stacie F. Beckerman
AI-related case
Harris v. St. Peter Investors, LLC et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · Minnesota · May 18, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Taylor v. City of Minneapolis, 202 F. Supp. 3d 933, 941–42 (D. Minn. 2016); the Court found this citation does not appear to exist and actually leads to an unrelated SD Indiana case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff c…
Judges: Laura Margarete Provinzino
AI-related case
Bank of America v. Mapp
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina · North Carolina · May 15, 2026
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Cited 28 U.S.C. § 1348 as broadly granting jurisdiction over any action by or against a bank; court found this to be a misrepresentation of the statute's scope. || Fabricated: Case Law | Filings contained citations to non-existent…
Judges: Thomas D. Schroeder