Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited this case as authority; the court noted it does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited this case as authority; the court noted it does not exist.
Judges: John O. Cooney
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | A quoted phrase was attributed to Travis v Preston though the opinion does not contain the language; the phrase actually appears in an inspection report and municipal code. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Penner v Seaway Hosp was cited for waiver though that decision does not address waiver and its parallel citation was misstated. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Shunk v State was cited for duty-to-mitigate authority but the case addresses governmental immunity, not mitigation of damages. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Miller v Chapman Contracting was cited for the standard of review though the decision does not address that standard; citation withdrawn and replaced with other authorities. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | A statement of MCR 2.201(B) was presented in wording derived from FRCP 17(a)(3) that Michigan's rule does not contain; the rule was misstated. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Beecher v Morse was cited with an incorrect parallel citation; the parallel cite was corrected. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Omnicom of Mich v Giannetti Inv Co was cited for a particular formulation about materiality of breach that the opinion does not state verbatim; citati…
Judges:
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's briefing contained a citation to at least one case that may not exist; the SDNY court and this Court flagged it as potentially fabricated. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff mischaracterized the holdings of cited precedents, claiming they supported propositions they do not; the Court corrected Plaintiff's representations of these cases.
Judges: Amanda M. Knapp
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant's briefs contained numerous mismatches between case names, legal propositions, and reporter citations that the court attributed to generative AI (false quotes/mismatches).
Judges: Matthew C. Lucas, Nelly Khouzam
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Ochoa v. P.A.M. Transport, Inc. with an incorrect Westlaw identifier and wrong district/date; court corrected to Ochoa v. P.A.M. Transp., No. SA-17-cv-787, 2018 WL 7297889 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2018). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Royal v. Integreon, Inc. with an incorrect Westlaw identifier and incorrect district/date; court corrected to Royal v. Integreon, Inc., No. 1:19-cv-822, 2020 WL 13836729 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2020). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited La. State Conference of the NAACP with an incorrect Westlaw identifier and wrong year; court corrected to La. State Conf. of the NAACP v. Louisiana, 490 F. Supp. 3d 982 (M.D. La. 2020). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited People’s Workshop, Inc. v. FEMA with an incorrect Westlaw identifier and incorrect decision year; court corrected to People’s Workshop, Inc. v. FEMA, No. CV 17-107, 2019 WL 1140196 (M.D. La. Mar. 12, 2019). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Jimenez v. CitiMortgage with an incorrect Westlaw identifier and wrong opinion date; court corrected to Jimenez v. Citimortgage, Inc., No. CV SA-17-ca-00134, 2017 WL 11236934 (W.…
Judges: Andrew M. Edison
AI-related case
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Editor’s note and court record reference multiple unverified citations in the filing, likely generated by AI; links unavailable but citations preserved in the record. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed language to Goode v. LexisNexis Risk & Information Analytics Group, Inc. and Moore v. Rite Aid that does not appear in those opinions; court and defendant noted the quotations do not exist.
Judges:
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed the quoted language "whether a worker is a 'borrowed servant' is generally a question of fact to be decided by the jury" to Gorton v. Rance; the court found no such quotation or discussion in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel claimed Starcher v. Byrne held borrowed-servant disputes are factual issues for the jury and cannot be decided on summary judgment; the court found Starcher does not contain that holding or the quoted language. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel miscited James v. Dedeaux as 242 So. 3d 905 and represented a rule (that facts must be undisputed) that the court says is not the majority holding; the correct citation is 217 So. 3d 785 and the brief appears to rely on a dissent. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel asserted Dawson v. Burgs established specific "elements" (e.g., 'first and most critical element is the existence of a contract of hire') and limits on implied contracts that the court found are not present in Dawson. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel attributed language about 'vicarious liability' and other holdings to Northern Electric Co. v. Phillips that the court could not find in tha…
Judges: Tomika H. Irving
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Rowe v Kingston with an incorrect citation and misstated the holding; Court corrected the citation and noted the misstatement. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found that some of plaintiff's cited caselaw did not correspond to reported decisions and were nonexistent/fictitious.
Judges: William J. Giacomo
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief cited a 1961 California appellate decision that does not appear to exist as cited. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Romero that the court found does not appear in that opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Tweel that the court found does not appear in that opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief cited a Seventh Circuit case that does not appear to exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief cited a Fifth Circuit unpublished opinion that does not appear to exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief cited a bankruptcy decision that does not appear to exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Strong v. County of Santa Cruz that the court found does not appear in that opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Lake v. Reed that the court found does not appear in that opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Romero (a criminal case) for the proposition that UCC provisions are binding, which the court found to be an inapposite or misrepresented use of that authority. || Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief cited a purported bankruptcy decision rep…
Judges:
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a quotation to Pinkstaff v. Black & Decker that does not appear in that decision; court noted Pinkstaff is not a workers' compensation case and does not contain the quoted text. || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel misquoted several other cases in the opening brief; the court identified multiple false quotations but did not list them individually.
Judges: