Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC). || False Quotes: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously included 'fake quotations' misattributed to real cases in prior filings (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).
Judges:
AI-related case
The court noted prior filings contained numerous fabricated citations but observed Castro had nominally improved by citing existing authority. Because existing sanctions from a prior order remained and the court found additional sanctions excessive, it denied the plaintiff's motion for further sanctions. The court attributed much of the problem to Castro's failure to review AI-generated material rather than prohibiting AI use outright.
Judges:
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Defense counsel attributed an inaccurate, expanded quotation to Seale v. Peacock; the language does not appear in Seale and overstates its holding.
Judges:
AI-related case
Judges:
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Prior filings by Plaintiff contained citations to fictitious cases; the court identified these as hallmarks of an AI 'hallucination.' || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff characterized Norberg v. Shutterfly as 'controlling' and as supporting standing for misdelivery of photos; the court held Norberg addressed biometric privacy/facial recognition and was not controlling or on point.
Judges: Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief relied on authorities or quotations that, as presented, did not support the legal arguments (misrepresentation of precedent). || False Quotes: Doctrinal Work | Brief inaccurately quoted statutes and portions of the record; the court noted the inaccurate quotations and record citations. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contained citations to caselaw that the court concluded do not exist; the opinion called these 'hallucinations' and held they are not valid authority.
Judges:
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum [99] cited Miller v. City of Greenville, 243 So. 2d 81, 83 (Miss. 1971), which the Court could not locate and deemed hallucinatory. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum [104] cited Riley v. City of Tupelo, No. 1:20-CV-186-GHD-DAS, 2023 WL 3568661, at 3 (N.D. Miss. May 18, 2023), which the Court could not verify. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum [104] cited Buckner v. Walker, No. 1:19-CV-146-SA-DAS, 2022 WL 2318582, at 4 (N.D. Miss. June 28, 2022), which the Court determined was fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum [104] cited Harris v. City of Grenada, No. 3:18-CV-158-DMB-RP, 2021 WL 6062574, at 7 (N.D. Miss. Dec. 22, 2021), which the Court could not locate. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition [105] contained two citations the Court found nonexistent, including City of Grenada v. Harrelson, 84 So. 3d 35, 38 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition [105] cited Crittendon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 99 So. 3d 751, 755 (Miss. 2012), which the Court identified as a hallucinatory citation. || False Quotes: Case Law | Post-show-cause review…
Judges: Sharion Aycock
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's initial motion included citations to cases that did not exist; the Court found these likely resulted from AI hallucination and required corrected citations. || False Quotes: Case Law | The motion contained quotations attributed to cases where those quotes do not appear; the Court determined these were likely AI-generated false quotes and ordered correction.
Judges: Thomas Lee Robinson Parker
AI-related case
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Plaintiffs' brief contained a completely fabricated quotation attributed to the Texas Tort Claims Act; counsel admitted it was generated by an AI chatbot and copied without verification; court noted the fabrication. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiffs cited CPRC §75.002(d) as waiving governmental immunity for gross negligence on public recreational land; the court agreed this was incorrect and noted the statute governs private landowner liability, not governmental immunity.
Judges:
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief included multiple nonexistent case citations and fake quotes supporting his arguments; concurrence noted appellee flagged them and recommended disregarding those arguments.
Judges: