AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 691 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
814 judge-case associations across 549 judges and 187 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
691Cases
814Judge-case associations
549Judges
187Courts
691 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Jorge A. Zea v. National Association of REALTORS
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · Florida · Mar 24, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Response contains fabricated quotations and paraphrases attributed to real cases across multiple pages; Court found quotations and legal concepts were fake and unreliable. || Misrepresented: Doctrinal Work | Advanced an AI-invented do…
Judges: William Matthewman
AI-related case
Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · National federal courts · Mar 24, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Iseminger v. Dist. Ct., 915 F.2d 1314 (10th Cir. 199…
Judges: Bobby Ray Baldock
AI-related case
Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · National federal courts · Mar 23, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited PGBA, LLC v. United States to argue procurement structure favored incumbents and rendered participation illusory; Board noted PGBA is a bid protest decision about award protest procedures and does not support Endure's contract…
Judges: Daniel S. Herzfeld
AI-related case
Jane Doe, et al. v. Lincoln Consolidated Schools, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Michigan · Mar 23, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a non-existent case string "Doe v. Univ. of Mich., No. 18-11914, 2019 WL 11793988, at *8 (E.D. Mich., Aug. 6, 2019)"; the Court could not locate the authority, characterized it as an AI‑hallucinated/"Frankenstein" citat…
Judges: Brandy Renée McMillion
AI-related case
Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah · Utah · Mar 23, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a non-existent case as legal authority; court found the case did not exist and counsel admitted failing to verify after using AI. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a second non-existent case…
Judges: Ted Stewart
AI-related case
Stafford v. Andrew Taffet, et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon · Oregon · Mar 23, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Campbell v. MERS, 2012 WL 3901716, at *5 (D. Or.)'; the court confirmed no such Oregon federal case exists (only an unrelated Texas state decision and the Oregon docket number corresponded to a different case). || Fabr…
Judges: Ann L. Aiken
AI-related case
Daniel Gentry v. Calvin Thompson et al.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana · Louisiana · Mar 20, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Second of nine case citations in Defendants' memorandum was nonexistent; Court noted unusual bullet-point formatting and counsel's failure to read the cited cases. || Fabricated: Case Law | Third of nine case citations in Defendants' me…
Judges: Carl J. Barbier
AI-related case
Pamela Blair v. Sanctuary Bluff Homeowners Association, Inc., et al.
Kentucky Court of Appeals · Kentucky · Mar 20, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's appellate briefs contained nine hallucinated citations and persistent misquoting/misinterpretation of precedent; appellant admitted using AI and submitting an incorrect draft; Court struck the brief and required refiling wit…
Judges: Susanne M. Cetrulo
AI-related case
State v. Coleman
Eleventh District Court of Appeals · Ohio · Mar 20, 2026
"{¶133} This case illustrates the peril. An attorney who, by his own counsel’s admission, was sophisticated in his understanding of AI tools permitted a non-attorney staff member to use a public generative AI platform to prepare an appellate filing. The AI to…
Judges: Eugene A. Lucci, John J. Eklund, Robert J. Patton
Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; Counsel disqualified in this case; Order to notify the judgment in other cases; CLE; Letter of apologyRead the decision ↗ AI-related case
Espinoza v. M&R Const. Group Inc.
Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Mar 19, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants cited 'Parrelli v. Temple Beth El of Great Neck, 304 A.D.2d 788, 789 [2d Dept 2003]' in support; court and plaintiff's counsel found no such case and the citation pointed to unrelated material.
Judges: Devin P. Cohen