United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

Source: Damien Charlotin

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

1,395 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Trauger v. Columbia County District Attorney's Office et al.

M.D. Pennsylvania · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 29, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff represented that Hakeem held pretrial detention over one year is presumptively prejudicial; court noted Hakeem held the opposite. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Reitz as supporting that district attorney's offices can be sued under § 1983; court noted Reitz held the Bucks County DA's Office is not an entity for § 1983 purposes. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff asserted the Police Department cited Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police though the Police Department's brief did not cite Will. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed the Police Department relied on Estate of Lagano, but the Police Department's filings contained no such citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff alleged the Police Department cited Albright v. Oliver though the court found no such citation in the department's brief.

Judges:

WarningAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

In re M.H., M.L., and M.H., Minors

CA Illinois (1d) · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 28, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Mother's brief referenced cases that do not exist (fictitious case holdings), prompting the Public Guardian to flag fabricated citations. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Mother's brief misstated the facts or holdings of cases she cited and included incorrect citations. The Public Guardian identified these substantive inaccuracies.

Judges:

Order to Show CauseAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

USA ex rels. v. Barton Associates, Inc.

1st Cir. CA · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 28, 2026

False Quotes: Case Law | Appellants' briefs quoted language that the court found does not appear in the cited cases or any case the court could locate. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellants' briefs misrepresented the holdings of several cases, citing them for propositions the cases do not support.

Judges:

Attribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLC

New York County Supreme Court · New York · May 28, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Citibank, N.A. v Velazquez, 150 AD3d 813, 814 [2d Dept 2017], but the correct authority is Citibank, N.A. v Wood, 150 AD3d 813, 814 [2d Dept 2017]; court rejected the miscitation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Guevara, 137 AD3d 460, 461 [1st Dept 2016], but the proper citation is D. Penguin Bros. Ltd. v Natl. Black United Fund, Inc., 137 AD3d 460, 461 [1st Dept 2016]; court found the citation does not support defendants' proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited 'Fidelity Natl. Title, Ins. Co. v Valtech Research, Inc., 73 AD3d 521, 522 [1st Dept 2010]' which yielded no results; Westlaw/Lexis correct the cite to Popowich v Korman, 73 AD3d 515, 522 [1st Dept 2010]. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Russo, 121 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2014] for a proposition not found in the reported decision; the court identified the actual decision as Sari v Alishaev Bros., Inc., 121 AD3d 506 [1st Dept 2014] which does not support defendants' claim. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited OneWestBank, FSB v Kanapathipillai, 188 AD3d 982, 9…

Judges: Lyle E. Frank

Adverse Costs OrderParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Boyle, et al. v. Steven Kramer

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Michigan · May 28, 2026

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs quoted the phrase "circumstances of the occasion" and attributed it to Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 (1974), but the phrase does not appear in that opinion; the Court flagged the quotation as factitious and likely AI-generated.

Judges: Judith Ellen Levy

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

H. C. v. Contreras

CA California (5d) · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 28, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited and the trial court relied on a nonexistent case, reproducing the language verbatim from the brief into the ruling. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The court adopted counsel's misstatement of Family Code §6203, treating imminent serious bodily injury as a required prerequisite rather than one of several alternative bases for abuse.

Judges:

Judgment reversed and remandedAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗CSV source ↗

AI-related case

Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda

Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · May 28, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a nonexistent case 'In re Katherine S., 118 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex. 2003)'; the court determined the case does not exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to Lane Bank that does not appear in that opinion; the court noted the quoted language is not found in Lane Bank and the case stands for a narrower proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited PNS Stores v. Rivera for a broad due-process proposition; the court explained the cited opinion concerned summary-judgment/jurisdictional issues and does not support the appellant's proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited In re D.W. for the proposition that courts commit reversible error when ignoring objections to procedural misconduct; the court observed the cited opinion addressed family-code and termination issues and does not support that broad proposition.

Judges: J. Wade Birdwell

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Roger Patel et al. v. Chandresh Patel et al.

W.D. Kentucky · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 28, 2026

Order to Show Cause is here.

Judges:

WarningAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

In the Matter of Kevin A. Julien v. Danielle M. Arthur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · New York · May 27, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a nonexistent Appellate Division, First Department decision to support a claim of judicial bias; court treated the citation as fabricated and linked it to unverified GenAI/online research use.

Judges: Paul Wooten

Monetary SanctionParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗