AI-related case
Coomer v. Lindell/MyPillow, Inc. (2)
Order to Show Cause is here.
Judges:
Monetary OrderAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗CSV source ↗
AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
Case screener
Find an AI-related case
1,395 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Eric Tobler v. Stephen Tobler, et al.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a false quotation and a fabricated holding attributed to Bunner v. Blow-Rite Insulation Co.; the court found Bunner did not address the cited issue and the quotation/holding was invented.
Judges:
AI-related case
Marriage of Nash
Fabricated: Case Law | Father cited cases that the court concluded did not exist; the opinion characterized these as resembling AI 'hallucinations.' || Misrepresented: Case Law | Father cited existing cases but misrepresented their holdings or relevance; court found they did not support his arguments.
Judges:
AI-related case
Stokka v. Stokka
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited multiple irrelevant, fictitious, or nonexistent legal authorities; the court identified these as likely AI hallucinations.
Judges: Jerod E. Tufte, Jon J. Jensen, Lisa K. Fair McEvers
AI-related case
Gregoire v. Board of Trustees of SF BART
Order to Show Cause is here. Counsel failed to answer.
Judges: Thomas S. Hixson
Monetary Sanction; Serve Order on client and Bar; CLEParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗
AI-related case
Boersma v. Davenport
Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified several completely fabricated case citations in the appellant's opening brief and found reliance on that fabricated authority had wasted judicial resources. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited multiple existing cases in ways unrelated to the propositions for which they were cited (mischaracterized or inapposite authority).
Judges:
AI-related case
Terrance Anthony Norris v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cites a non-existent case, GAI Consultants, Inc. v. Homestead Vill. Ltd. P’ship, 961 F. Supp. 1437 (E.D. Pa. 1997); Court notes the opinion does not exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quotation to Diesel Props S.r.l. v. Greystone Bus. Credit II LLC, 631 F.3d 42 (2d Cir. 2011) that does not appear in that opinion; Court identifies the quotation as nonexistent. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quotation to Dalton v. Educ. Testing Serv., 87 N.Y.2d 384, 394 (1995) that does not exist in that opinion; Court identifies the quotation as nonexistent.
Judges: Hector Gonzalez
AI-related case
Amanda Adams v. Allen Butler Construction, Inc.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited several cases that do not exist; the court found many authorities she cited were non-existent and therefore could not support her arguments. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed quotations to real cases that the court found do not contain the quoted language (fictitious quotations). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant inaccurately described case holdings and mischaracterized the propositions for which authorities were cited. || Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Appellant mischaracterized clerk's and reporter's records in her brief, according to the court's review.
Judges: Alex L. Yarbrough
Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗
AI-related case
DOE, J. et al v. The Trustees of Columbia University
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioners' papers included fabricated case citations generated by AI; opposing counsel pointed them out and counsel withdrew and apologized.
Judges: Lyle E. Frank
AI-related case
Seeto v. Kendall
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the phrase “would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judge to forget the burden of proof” to Withrow v. Larkin, but the court found that language does not appear in Withrow. || Fabricated: Other | Court noted risk that AI research/drafting tools can hallucinate or fabricate legal authority, possibly explaining some of the plaintiff's inaccurate citations. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bittinger v. Tecumseh Products Co. for the proposition that voluntary engagement with a motion waives procedural objections, but the court found Bittinger (an ERISA/res judicata/privity case) does not support that waiver proposition.
Judges: Jennifer Anna Dorsey