United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

1,395 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al

U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · Minnesota · May 5, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found plaintiff's filings contained citations to non-existent cases and suggested generative AI produced fabricated case citations; no specific fabricated citations were identified in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court found quotations in the filings that do not appear in the cited cases (false quotes), indicating the plaintiff submitted inaccurate quotes likely generated by AI; no specific misquoted passages were reproduced in the opinion.

Judges: Patrick Joseph Schiltz

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.

D. Hawai'i · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 5, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified multiple record- and case-citation errors in plaintiff's oppositions that the court tied to use of AI tools; counsel admitted client used AI and accepted responsibility.

Judges:

Monetary SanctionAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Van Deel v. A-Plus Contracting, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District · Missouri · May 5, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief contained multiple inaccurate or nonexistent caselaw citations, which the court said materially impeded appellate review; invalid citations were preserved in the record and links removed. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'B.M. v. J.S., 775 S.W. 2d 917 (Mo. App. W.P. 1989)', which the court was unable to verify as an existing opinion.

Judges: Gary M. Gaertner Jr., James M. Dowd

Party using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Jessica Fuller v. Hyde School, et al.

D. Maine · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 5, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found filings cited several cases for propositions unsupported by the record; some authorities appeared fabricated or could not be located. || False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted language in the filings could not be found in the cited sources—Court concluded quotations were absent from the authorities cited. || Misrepresented: Case Law | The filings contained inaccurate pincites and incorrect citation details; the Notice of Errata repeated and extended some of these errors.

Judges:

CLE; Firm procedures and certification; Serve Order to plaintiff; Brief struckAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Hannah Renee Payne v. The State

Supreme Court of Georgia · Georgia · May 5, 2026

Video of oral argument here (part on hallucinations comes at 32:45); further response here.

Judges: Shawn Ellen LaGrua, Verda M. Colvin

Admonishment; 6-month suspension from appearing before the Supreme Court; 12 hours CLE; trial court order vacated and case remandedParty using AI: OtherRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Barber v. Morawa

CA Michigan · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 5, 2026

See recording of oral hearing from 5 May 2026.

Judges:

Admonishment in courtAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Devin A. Robinson v. Velosio, LLC

U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · Maryland · May 4, 2026

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's brief contained quotations attributed to cases that were inaccurate or from non-existent authorities; Defendants flagged the false quotations and the plaintiff filed a declaration addressing them. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's response brief included non-existent case citations; Defendants' reply pointed out the citations do not exist and the Court noted the issue.

Judges: Adam Ben Abelson

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Eliott Williamson v. TransUnion LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · National federal courts · May 4, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Williamson cited numerous nonexistent cases in his filings; opposing parties flagged many citations as to non-existent authorities and the magistrate judge found these citations to be willful misuse. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Williamson misstated and misrepresented case holdings to make them support his position; the magistrate judge characterized these misrepresentations as egregious and willful. || False Quotes: Case Law | Williamson misquoted existing cases in filings; the magistrate judge found misquotations and noted they were used to support his claims.

Judges: William Holcombe Pryor Jr.

Affirmed on appeal earlier dismissal with prejudiceParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Richard Paul Smith v. Verra Mobility Corporation et al.

M.D. Florida · Jurisdiction not recorded · May 1, 2026

Order to Show Cause is here.

Judges:

Order to Notify ClientAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗