AI-related case
Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi
Order to show cause is here.
Judges: Halil Suleyman Ozerden
AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
Case screener
Find an AI-related case
1,395 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Drip Capital, Inc. v. SGM Socher Inc.
Fabricated: Case Law | Defense counsel cited "Gildea v Sheridan" in the opposition brief; the court found no such case and treated it as an AI-generated fabrication. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense counsel cited "Jones Wolf Realty v 2 E. 79th St. Corp." in the opposition brief; the court found no such case and treated it as an AI-generated fabrication.
Judges: Jennifer G. Schecter
AI-related case
Sherdena Rocky Ali v. Carlos Efre Idiokitas
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a non-existent case; exhaustive search of published and unpublished opinions yielded no results, court identified it as a hallucinated citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a second non-existent case; court could not locate the opinion and treated it as an AI-generated hallucination.
Judges:
AI-related case
Chamberlain v. City of Albany
Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed Plaintiff cited non-existent cases in his filings; court warned about citing fake opinions and referenced authority cautioning against AI-generated fake cases.
Judges: Leslie Abrams Gardner
AI-related case
Yasmani Gurri Rubio v. Markwayne Mullin, et al.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to In re United States (4th Cir.); the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to Hahn v. United States (1883); the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.; the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to Tutun v. United States (1926) and mischaracterized the case's holding; the quoted language does not appear and the cited case supports the opposite proposition. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported quotation from Taalebinezhaad v. Chertoff (D. Mass.) that does not exist in the cited pages, though the court did deny remand in that case.
Judges: Adam Ben Abelson
AI-related case
Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.
First order to Show Cause is here.
Judges: Jerry H. Ritter, Jr
AI-related case
Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al
Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | December 3, 2024 filing cited 'Kyser v. Summit County Children Services, 2022-Ohio-1207,' but court's search showed the reporter corresponds to a different case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to 'In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co., 41 Ohio St.2d 41' was misattributed; reporter corresponds to a different named opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to 'Baker v. Coast to Coast Manpower, LLC, 2020-Ohio-4533' corresponded to a different published decision on search.
Judges:
AI-related case
Burnside v. Verdick, et al.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Jones v. County of Los Angeles, 802 Fed. App’x 282 (9th Cir. 2020)'; court found no such case and Westlaw returned In re Wing Cheung Wong, 802 F. App'x 280, 282 (9th Cir. 2020). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Thompson v. Hong, 2020 IL App (2d) 190551'; court found the citation corresponds to Fay v. Fifty K Corporation, No. 2-19-0551, 2020 WL 2095845 (Ill. App. Ct. Apr. 29, 2020) (alt. 2020 IL App (2d) 190551-U). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Wallace v. County of Los Angeles, 479 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (C.D. Cal. 2020)'; court located Curtis v. Oliver, 479 F. Supp. 3d 1039, 1088 (D.N.M. 2020) instead, indicating mismatch/nonexistent title. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Estate of Smith v. Shulz, 2018 WL 2192187 (N.D. Iowa)'; court found the citation number corresponds to Cabrera v. N.Y. Fresh Meat Inc., 2018 WL 2192187 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2018), not a N.D. Iowa decision. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Yates v. Mansfield, 2014 WL 11535036 (S.D. Iowa)'; court search returned a U.S. FDA safety report (Feb. 19, 2014) rather than any S.D. Iowa case, indicating a non-existent case citation. || Fabricate…
Judges: Stephanie Marie Rose
AI-related case
Darrin L. Johnson, Jr. v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, et al.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case for the proposition that loss of one's home is irreparable; the court could not locate the opinion and identified the citation as likely AI-generated.
Judges: Julie Rebecca Rubin
AI-related case
K.C. v. D.R.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not appear to exist (listed by court). || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not appear to exist (listed by court). || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not appear to exist; court could not locate the citation and noted appellant repeated it. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant provided a purported quote attributed to an existing case that the court found does not exist in that opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant misrepresented the holding of an existing case, claiming it reversed a protective order when the court actually affirmed. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited multiple existing cases that the court found did not support the propositions for which they were cited.
Judges: J. Wade Birdwell
Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗