AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
1,395 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Loyer v. Wayne County Michigan et al.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Michigan · Apr 28, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Brief attributed quotes or content to authorities that the cited sources did not contain (false or misattributed quotations). || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief included multiple entirely fictitious case citations supplied by AI; court found the case law bogus. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief contained citations with incorrect citations (different citations than purported authorities).
Judges: Curtis Ivy, Jr, Shalina Deborah Kumar
Ordered to attend an ethics seminar and produce proof of attendanceParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗ AI-related case
Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · California · Apr 28, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Filed brief included a citation to a nonexistent case; court found the citation fabricated and tied its inclusion in part to AI use. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found the brief misrepresented the holding of a real case cited by counsel.
Judges: Peter H. Kang
Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order CirculationParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗ AI-related case
Ali Behroz Aziz, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · Maryland · Apr 27, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a non-existent case, "United States v. $17,900 in U.S. Currency" (ECF No. 59 at 8); Court found this case does not appear to exist.
Judges: Adam Ben Abelson
AI-related case
In the Matter of the Application of Jonathan David Rinaldi
Queens County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Apr 27, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited nonexistent case law in his memorandum; court observed some citations appeared fabricated.
Judges: Tracy Catapano-Fox
AI-related case
Marble v. O'Malley
M.D. Pennsylvania · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 27, 2026
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Complaint advances an invented doctrine labeled 'attorney-equivalent compensation' that the court could not find in state or federal jurisprudence; court characterizes this as an AI-generated doctrinal invention. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's TRO brief attributes a holding to Manuel v. City of Joliet that it references Younger doctrine; the court states Manuel does not reference Younger and treats the attributed holding as fabricated. || Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff submitted an 'Excerpt of an Official Court Transcript' that does not resemble a stenographic transcript and appears prepared by the plaintiff or an AI service; court questions its authenticity.
Judges:
AI-related case
Moore v. Wireless CCTV LLC
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas · Texas · Apr 27, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Pleading cited 'Thomas v. City of San Marcos (W.D. Tex.)', which the court checked and found does not exist; court treated it as likely AI-generated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Pleading cited 'Cole v. Sandler, 2014 WL 266501 (E.D. La.)'; court found the citation does not exist and the Westlaw number points to a different case (Cole v. Hunter), not supporting plaintiff's proposition.
Judges: Lee Hyman Rosenthal
AI-related case
Rhonda L. H.-B. v. Commissioner of Social Security
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · New York · Apr 27, 2026
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Multiple templated captions and placeholders (e.g., venue/case fields left as blanks or bracketed placeholders) indicating unedited AI-generated output. || Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Repeated verbatim occurrence of the nonsensical sentence 'If it does not make logic, it does not make sense.' throughout the brief, suggesting AI generation.
Judges: Barbara Moses
AI-related case
Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd
Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Apr 24, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Klapper v. Graziano, 41 Misc 3d 401, 410 (Sup Ct 2013)' and attributed the statement that releases 'are enforceable and are not to be lightly set aside,' but the quoted language does not appear in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Clark v. Velsiplast Corp., 88 A.D.2d 859 (1st Dep't 1982)' and quoted from it, but the citation is incorrect (actual case is People v Ford, 88 A.D.2d 859) and the quoted language does not appear. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited 'Shah v. Levy, 56 A.D.3d 574 (2d Dep't 2008)' for a proposition unrelated to that action; citation misrepresents the authority's relevance. || Fabricated: Case Law | Submission contained numerous other phantom cases and lengthy fabricated quotes generated by AI, as noted by the court.
Judges: Gina Abadi
AI-related case
Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · National federal courts · Apr 24, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to Spinelli v. United States that does not appear in the opinion; court could not find the quote and suspected AI generation, so it disregarded the reliance on it. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Meechaicum v. Fountain for a holding about Eighth Amendment claims that the court found not to exist and suspected the citation was fabricated or misattributed by AI.
Judges: Allison Hartwell Eid
AI-related case
Laurie Ibach and Mark Stewart v. Bruce Stewart
Supreme Court of Alabama · Alabama · Apr 24, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent Nebraska Court of Appeals decision presented as on‑point; Court found the citation actually pointed to unrelated Iowa criminal cases. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a purported Alabama Civil Appellate opinion that does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an apparently fictitious Alabama case used to support tolling/estoppel arguments. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Ex parte Helms that does not appear in that opinion; Court found the quoted language absent from Helms. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed language to Ex parte Seabol regarding fiduciary concealment tolling the statute that the Court found is not in the cited pages of Seabol. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent Alabama appellate decision repeatedly to support estoppel/limitations arguments. || False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Janowiak v. Tiesi as supporting a proposition; Court found the quoted material not present and the reporter/pinpoint citations mismatched. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an apparently fabricated Illinois appellate opinion purportedly imposing constructive trust for undue influence; Court found no case matching…
Judges: Chris McCool, Sarah H. Stewart
Adverse Costs Order; Doubled Costs; Filing Prohibition; Bar ReferralParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗ 