United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

1,395 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

United States v. Jose Marquez

5th Cir. CA · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 24, 2026

False Quotes: Case Law | Nearly every quotation from existing caselaw in the brief was misquoted or fabricated, per the court's review. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Legal propositions claimed to be supported by cited caselaw were often inapposite or contradicted by Fifth Circuit precedent. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief cites non-existent cases; court found some cited cases do not exist.

Judges:

WarningAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

O.K., LLC v. Melka

CA California (2d) · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 23, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's brief asserts several cases cited by Melka do not exist; court noted respondent's claim as indicative of likely AI-generated (fabricated) citations but did not identify specific citations in the opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent's brief asserts several citations Melka used do not support the propositions for which they were cited (misrepresentation of case law); court acknowledged the assertion but did not evaluate those specific citations.

Judges:

Attribution unresolvedParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Gunter v. Contango ORE, Inc., et al.

U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska · Alaska · Apr 23, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Jimerson v. Tetlin Native Corp. as holding that transactions affecting ANCSA lands are invalid absent shareholder consent; the Court found that Jimerson concerned ANCSA stock transfers, not land, and did not support the plaintiff's claim. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Akiachak as establishing federal oversight authority over ANCSA land transactions; the Court noted that Akiachak did not establish such a rule and that the D.C. Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Chugach Natives, Inc. v. Doyon, Ltd. to argue the 1996 deed was improper; the Court explained that Chugach concerned whether sand and gravel are part of the surface or subsurface estate and did not support the plaintiff's corporate-voting theory. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Plaintiff relied on a non-existent or 'phantom' ANCSA provision purportedly imposing a shareholder-vote requirement for land transfers; the Court found no such provision in ANCSA and called the argument frivolous. || Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Multiple citations in the plaintiff's filings contained incorrect or incompl…

Judges: Aaron Christian Peterson

AdmonishmentParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

IN RE PAULA M. MILLER, Relator

Texas 1st Court of Appeals · Texas · Apr 23, 2026

Concurring opinion noted the mandamus petition contained attributions and quotations to caselaw that strongly appear to be AI-fabricated hallucinations; court emphasized counsel must verify AI research and warned of potential corrective measures (striking briefs, reporting to State Bar).

Judges: Terry Adams

WarningParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Fatima Meziane v. Abdelouahab Aitouche

CA Maryland · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 23, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a non-existent Maryland case 'Hurd v. Hurd, 223 Md. App. 654, 667–68 (2015)'; the court found no such case and that the citation actually led to unrelated opinions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a non-existent Maryland case 'Bradley v. Bradley, 174 Md. App. 234, 248–50 (2007)'; the court found the citation did not exist and led to unrelated cases, concluding it was apparently fictitious.

Judges:

Attribution unresolvedParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Joann Crawford v. Buffalo Creek Properties, LLC

CA Texas · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 23, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'In re Estate of Denman' at 462 S.W.3d 641 (Tex. App.—Austin 2015, no pet.); the court found this citation incorrect/misplaced (page cite corresponds to an Arkansas criminal case) and that Texas decisions titled In re Denman have different cites. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant referenced 'Hercenberger v. Proctor' without a reporter citation; the court found no binding authority by that name and no supporting citation. || Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Appellant cited a study titled 'Underestimating the Unrepresented: Cognitive Biases Disadvantage Pro Se Litigants in Family Law Cases'; the court indicated it could find no record of a binding authority or known publication by that name.

Judges:

Attribution unresolvedParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.

E.D. California · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 22, 2026

False Quotes: Case Law | Court found plaintiff misquoted and enlarged the scope of Kachlon; the quoted language does not appear in the opinion and was used to support removing nominal status for trustees. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court found the Barrionuevo quotation was nonexistent or unrelated to the cited opinion; Barrionuevo addresses the tender rule and does not discuss nominal party status.

Judges:

Monetary Sanction; Bar ReferralAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang

SC Nevada · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 22, 2026

Order to Show Cause is here.

Judges:

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected briefAttribution unresolvedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Daniel D’Agostino v. Circle K Stores Incorporated, et al.

D. Arizona · Jurisdiction not recorded · Apr 22, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Navient Solutions, LLC v. Law Offices of Jeffrey Lohman, 2020 WL 1864871, at *12 (D. Ariz. 2020).' The Court found that citation does not exist, observed Circle K pointed out the error, and noted Plaintiff likely intended Navient Sols., LLC v. Law Offices of Jeffrey Lohman, 2020 WL 1867939 (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2020), which is irrelevant to the claim.

Judges:

Attribution unresolvedParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗