Search 691 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
814 judge-case associations across 549 judges and 187 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contained multiple fictitious case citations generated by AI (cases that did not exist). Court found citations were fabricated and not verifiable. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief cited existent cases that did not stand for the…
Judges: Kathryn Grill Graeff
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Johnson v. City of Shelby that does not appear in that decision; Court notes the quoted text is not in the cited opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pearson v. Callahan wh…
Judges: John Joseph Tuchi
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff filed briefs containing multiple citations to nonexistent cases; the court and defendant identified these as fabricated case citations and the Magistrate Judge noted Plaintiff admitted filing them.
Judges: R. Stan Baker
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Hughes v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, No. 3:20-cv-00670 (M.D. Tenn. June 11, 2021)'; the court was unable to locate the case in research databases and suggested it may be an AI-generated hallucination.
Judges: Analisa Nadine Torres
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Matter of Oppenheimer v. City of New York, 193 A.D.2d 457 [1st Dept 1993]'; the Court reviewed and confirmed no such case exists and that the intended case did not support plaintiff's proposition.
Judges: Lyle E. Frank
AI-related case
Lawyer later explained that he had "used Microsoft’s Copilot for its editing functions in an effort to review and improve the draft document by fixing grammar, spelling, and improving badly phrased sentences" - not for legal research.On November 12, 2025, the…
Judges: Michael H. Simon
AI-related case
" Moreover, we take this opportunity to caution practitioners of this Commonwealth on the submission of briefs or citations without confirming their accuracy and the correctness of the resulting analysis. The abject failure to conduct due diligence when makin…
Judges: Audra Jean Eckerle, Susanne M. Cetrulo
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'R.D. Bennett Constr. Co. v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 196, 206 (1962)'; the Court noted the reporter citation corresponds to Lipp v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 197 (1962), and admonished the plainti…
Judges: Eleni M. Roumel
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed quotations to cases that do not contain the quoted material; the court observed these nonexistent quotations and linked them to apparent AI reliance.
Judges: Rudolph Contreras
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Corey's brief cited case law that the Court found led to different or no cases; Court concluded the citations were non-existent and could not support dismissal for mootness.
Judges: Daniel John Crothers