AI-related case
The Advocates for Human Rights and L.H.M. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.
False Quotes: Case Law | Brief riddled with misquotations
Judges:
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Brief riddled with misquotations
Judges:
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Filing attributed a quoted passage to Nishimatsu Construction Co. v. Houston National Bank; the court searched the opinion and other sources and found the quotation does not exist; attorney admitted AI use and lack of diligence. || Fabricated: Case Law | Filing attributed a quoted sentence to Whelan v. Abell; the court found no such quotation in that opinion or elsewhere and concluded the sentence was fabricated by AI.
Judges: Harold Dean Mooty III
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited 'Shapiro v JPMorgan Chase & Co., No. 1:13-cv-09764-PGG, 2014 WL 1224546' does not correspond to any case; SDNY docket shows the number not associated with that name. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Bally v. Home Loan Servicing, LP, No. 2:09-cv-02445-MCE-KJM, 2011 WL 867568' does not bring up a case by that name and the case number is assigned to a different matter. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Pasillas v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. 2:12-cv-01107, 2013 WL 3873227' cited in plaintiff's reply does not correspond to a case by that name and the case number is assigned to a different case in this court. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Boyle v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 2:13-cv-02021-APG-VCF, 2015 WL 1321435' does not correspond to any case by that name and the case number is assigned to a different case in this court. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Holmes v. Countrywide Financial Corp., No. 2:10-cv-00333-RCJ-PAL, 2010 WL 11597538' does not bring up a case by that name and the number refers to another matter in this court. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court found plaintiff cites Jolley at 213 Cal. App. 4th 872, 90…
Judges:
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Protester submitted citations to non-existent decisions; GAO found the citations did not correspond to real authorities and noted hallmarks of AI-generated content. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Protester provided cases with different citation information than those cited in its response, and cited authorities that did not stand for the propositions asserted; GAO treated these as misrepresentations likely from unverified AI use.
Judges:
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple cases cited by plaintiffs were so inaccurately cited that the Court was unable to locate them and questioned whether they exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs used a quotation that does not appear in the cited case (false quotation noted by the Court).
Judges: Edward Sunyol Kiel
AI-related case
The limerick in question: "There once was a litigant pro se,Who let an AI lead the way.It briefed every claim,Cited cases—by name,That vanished by morning’s next day."
Judges:
AI-related case
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Plaintiff quoted non-existent statutory language as if from 50 U.S.C. § 3936, asserting it tolled filing deadlines (the Court found the quoted language does not appear in § 3936). || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff purported to quote existing opinions (e.g., Conroy v. Aniskoff and Gordon) but recited language that appears nowhere in those opinions; the Court found these to be false quotations.
Judges: Kenneth M. Karas
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in his Amended Complaint; the court found it does not appear to exist and treated it as a hallucinated citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in his Amended Complaint; the court found it does not appear to exist and treated it as a hallucinated citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in his Amended Complaint; the court found it does not appear to exist and treated it as a hallucinated citation.
Judges: R. Austin Huffaker Jr.
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief (Doc. 39) contained numerous fabricated cases and troubling citation inconsistencies; opposing counsel identified the fake citations (Doc. 41); plaintiff later apologized and withdrew or corrected the filings (Doc. 47). || Fabricated: Case Law | Subsequent filing (Doc. 43) again included fake cases; court noted repeated use of fabricated citations and citation inconsistencies in the docket.
Judges: James E. Grimes, Jr
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc., No. 12-cv-1247, 2016 WL 3635771, at *4–5 (D. Del. June 29, 2016)" but the Court's Westlaw search returned no documents for 2016 WL 3635771; the District of Delaware docket numbers and dates did not match and no opinion on that date was found.
Judges: John D. Early