AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 691 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
814 judge-case associations across 549 judges and 187 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
691Cases
814Judge-case associations
549Judges
187Courts
691 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Khan v. Howard County BAP
Appellate Court of Maryland · Maryland · Jul 20, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited case does not exist at the principal citation; the correct case is MVA v. Deering, 438 Md. 611 (2014). || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited case does not exist; correct case at that citation is Johnson v…
Judges: Terrence M. Zic
AI-related case
Erik Arthur Otteson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Jul 17, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the phrase 'refuse[s] to articulate its reasons' to Wells Fargo v. Arizona Laborers, but that language does not appear in that opinion; the Court characterized this as likely an AI hallucination.
Judges: Dominic William Lanza
AI-related case
Ammann v. Markel Insurance Company
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio · Ohio · Jul 16, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent Ohio case 'Pilch v. Dept. of Human Servs.' as support for assignability of bad-faith claims; the Court found no such authority and concluded the citation was AI-generated.
Judges: J. Philip Calabrese
AI-related case
Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · Florida · Jul 16, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's cited Shetty v. Palm Beach Radiation Oncology Assocs., Inc. but used a non-existent pinpoint (cited to p. 625) and misstated the scope of the case's holding; court identified the pin cite as erroneous. || Misrepresented: Case…
Judges: Daniel C. Irick
AI-related case
Chryshawna A. and Jeremy Webb v. Sullivan County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Indiana · Jul 16, 2026
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The Webbs cited Ind. Trial Rule 53.2 and Ind. Tax Court Rule 14 but used them to support propositions those rules do not stand for; the court concluded the citations were mischaracterized, likely by generative AI.
Judges: Justin McAdam
AI-related case
Izzeddin Ahmed Abdulghaffar Daghra v. Steve Hinkley, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan · Michigan · Jul 16, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Government cited a non-existent Sixth Circuit opinion 'Taylor v. Hott' at 724 F. App'x 387, 392; court found no such case and page 387 belongs to a different opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Government attributed the quoted language '…
Judges: Hala Yalda Jarbou
AI-related case
Lohbeck v. CSL Plasma Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California · California · Jul 16, 2026
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff asserted the complaint was filed/served on December 15, 2025, contrary to the state-court record showing service on March 10, 2026. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff misquoted Gaskell v. Weir, attributing…
Judges: Chi S Kim
AI-related case
Shaddai Harris v. Iliac, LLC
Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · Jul 16, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | The opinion identifies an inaccurate citation Harris relied on—'Valdez v. Robertson, No. 01-19-00624-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 5211...'—and states the citation is incorrect and does not support her proposition.
Judges: Brian Walker, J. Wade Birdwell
AI-related case
Arrieta v. Cervantes
Court of Appeals of Arizona · Arizona · Jul 15, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. Gilman', a case the court identified as nonexistent and rejected reliance on it. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Silva v. De Mendoza', another case the court identified as nonexistent.
Judges: Garye L. Vasquez, Karl C. Eppich, Michael F. Kelly