Search 691 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
814 judge-case associations across 549 judges and 187 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Rather ironically, plaintiff was seeking to disqualify law firm Butler Snow (of Johnson v. Dunn fame) from the case.
Judges: Michael T. Parker
AI-related case
"Chandra’s self-represented status does not permit him to submit information blindly. Likeevery other person who appears before the court, he has an obligation to confirm that arguments andcase law submitted to the court are supported by existing law, and a f…
Judges: Donna M. Ryu
AI-related case
Timothy J. Beall, a pro se litigant, admitted to using AI software to generate filings with fabricated citations. The court did not impose monetary sanctions but required Beall to include a written representation of citation accuracy in future filings. The co…
Judges: John A. Woodcock Jr.
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Doe v. Major Airline (2020)'; court confirmed the case does not exist and included it among fabricated authorities that warrant sanction. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case…
Judges: Lisette Marie Reid, Roy Kalman Altman
AI-related case
In their Response, Counsel confessed to the use of AI tools in their Response to the OSC.(As recounted by Above the Law, the law firm involved quickly deleted a recent post they made about using AI.)In the Order, the judge prefaced her findings by noting that…
Judges: Anna Marie Manasco
AI-related case
Counsel admitted his law clerk used AI tools and failed to verify the citations. The court imposed a $2,500 monetary sanction, required completion of CLE in ethics/legal technology, and ordered service of the sanction order to the plaintiff.
Judges: Marina Garcia Marmolejo
AI-related case
Counsel submitted a response to an Order to Show Cause that included a false quote attributed to none other than Mata v. Avianca, a case about hallucinations.
Judges: Katherine Polk Failla
AI-related case
Counsel confessed having Claude Sonnet 4 to draft a legal submission, which included fabricated quotations from legal authorities. Counsel said he was pressed by time.After holding that there is "no reason to distinguish between the submission of fabricated c…
Judges: Anne Marie Nardacci
AI-related case
CA Ohio addressed alleged AI-generated hallucinations in Smith v. Gamble.
Judges: Matthew R. Byrne, Robert A. Hendrickson, Robin N. Piper, III
AI-related case
Defendant Holly Nelson, appearing pro se, filed a motion to dismiss that included a fabricated case citation, Finch v. Smith, which does not exist. The court inferred that Nelson used AI to draft the motion without verifying the accuracy of the citations. The…
Judges: Benjamin M. Burningham