United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

4 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Barari v. Burgess

Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jun 26, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not exist — a 'hallucinated' case — which the court identified as a fabricated citation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Numerous inaccurate citations (about 24 of 52) that misstate case facts, holdings, and rules and attribute principles to cases that do not support them.

Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.

Brief StruckParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Ngaruiya v. Gill

Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jun 16, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief misrepresents In re Marriage of Thorn by attributing language that does not appear and applying it to an unrelated proposition. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Brief misquotes Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and misattributes or misstates related authority (Ruffino and Hilgeman) in support of the rule proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains two fabricated quotations purportedly from Master Fin., Inc. v. Woodburn; court found the quoted language did not appear in the opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains a fabricated quotation purportedly from Bollermann v. Nowlis though the case does not concern the asserted proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains a fabricated quotation purportedly from Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., but the quoted language does not appear and the case does not support the proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains a fabricated quotation purportedly from State v. Silva; court noted Silva generally concerns the proposition but the quotation was fabricated or inaccurate. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief misquotes Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co.; court noted Mull…

Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Villanueva v. Bowers

Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jun 11, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a non-existent case; opposing counsel identified the error and the court noted the citation did not correspond to any real authority. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contained citations to cases with incorrect and impossible pin cites that did not match the cited authorities. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a memorandum decision with an impossible/pre-2015 issuance date inconsistent with the court record.

Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.

Adverse Costs OrderParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Volesky v. Department of Child Safety

Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jan 21, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'In re Dependency of D.F.-M., 236 Ariz. 33, 36 (App. 2014)'; the court explained the name corresponds to a Washington juvenile case (157 Wash.App.179) while the Arizona reporter citation refers to an unrelated Arizona criminal case (State v. Flores), concluding the citation is incorrect/fabricated.

Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗