AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
3 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Khan v. Howard County BAP
Appellate Court of Maryland · Maryland · Jul 20, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited case does not exist at the principal citation; the correct case is MVA v. Deering, 438 Md. 611 (2014). || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited case does not exist; correct case at that citation is Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., 387 Md. 1 (2005). || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited case name does not exist at the cited citation; actual case is Marshall v. Holmes, 141 U.S. 589 (1891). || Fabricated: Case Law | Court determined the citation does not exist and the principal citation corresponds to a different case. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court held the cited opinion does not contain the language the appellant purports to quote; citation does not support the asserted proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found the authority cited does not stand for the proposition asserted by appellant. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court noted the cited case does not contain the language appellant purports to quote.
Judges: Terrence M. Zic
AI-related case
Brandy Dorsey v. Walter Livramento, III
Appellate Court of Maryland · Maryland · May 20, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited an inexistent opinion; court struck the related argument. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent case, which the court identified and struck from the brief; court noted reporter citations corresponded to different cases. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant relied on a cited case that does not exist; court struck the portion of the brief relying on it. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent appellate decision as authority; court struck the assertion based on that citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent case; court noted the citation irregularity and struck the portion relying on it. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not exist under the given citation; court struck the portion relying on it. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited a real case but for a proposition the case does not support; the court explained the cited decision addressed a different subject.
Judges: Rosalyn Tang
AI-related case
Mezu v. Mezu
Appellate Court of Maryland · Maryland · Oct 29, 2025
Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contained multiple fictitious case citations generated by AI (cases that did not exist). Court found citations were fabricated and not verifiable. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief cited existent cases that did not stand for the propositions for which they were cited (misrepresentation of precedent). || False Quotes: Case Law | Brief included misquoted passages and quotations attributed to cases that were inaccurate.
Judges: Kathryn Grill Graeff
Referral to Attorney Grievance CommissionParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗ 