AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
5 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
WRI Summit REIT LP v. Kuerschner
Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Aug 10, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant quoted Burton as containing language about 'manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons,' which the court found does not appear in Burton. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a de novo review statement re § 12-350 to Bennett that the cited paragraph does not contain. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant cited Brown for a due-process rule ('Rulings which prevent a party from presenting evidence strike at the heart of due process') though Brown is a 1998 appellate decision and does not contain that language. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case the court could not locate (appears non-existent in Arizona appellate reports). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant asserted Takieh reversed a fee sanction for failure to make explicit findings under § 12-350; court found Takieh did not contain that language and in fact affirmed the sanction. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant represented Hertz as a published, citable opinion when it is an unpublished memorandum decision and cannot be cited for persuasive value. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Starr Pass with incorrect…
Judges: Brian Y. Furuya, D. Andrew Gaona, Jennifer M. Perkins
AI-related case
Barari v. Burgess
Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jun 26, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not exist — a 'hallucinated' case — which the court identified as a fabricated citation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Numerous inaccurate citations (about 24 of 52) that misstate case facts, holdings, and rules and attribute principles to cases that do not support them.
Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.
AI-related case
Ngaruiya v. Gill
Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jun 16, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief misrepresents In re Marriage of Thorn by attributing language that does not appear and applying it to an unrelated proposition. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Brief misquotes Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and misattributes or misstates related authority (Ruffino and Hilgeman) in support of the rule proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains two fabricated quotations purportedly from Master Fin., Inc. v. Woodburn; court found the quoted language did not appear in the opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains a fabricated quotation purportedly from Bollermann v. Nowlis though the case does not concern the asserted proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains a fabricated quotation purportedly from Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., but the quoted language does not appear and the case does not support the proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contains a fabricated quotation purportedly from State v. Silva; court noted Silva generally concerns the proposition but the quotation was fabricated or inaccurate. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief misquotes Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co.; court noted Mull…
Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.
AI-related case
Villanueva v. Bowers
Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jun 11, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a non-existent case; opposing counsel identified the error and the court noted the citation did not correspond to any real authority. || Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contained citations to cases with incorrect and impossible pin cites that did not match the cited authorities. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a memorandum decision with an impossible/pre-2015 issuance date inconsistent with the court record.
Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.
AI-related case
Volesky v. Department of Child Safety
Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One · Arizona · Jan 21, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'In re Dependency of D.F.-M., 236 Ariz. 33, 36 (App. 2014)'; the court explained the name corresponds to a Washington juvenile case (157 Wash.App.179) while the Arizona reporter citation refers to an unrelated Arizona criminal case (State v. Flores), concluding the citation is incorrect/fabricated.
Judges: Andrew M. Jacobs, Brian Y. Furuya, James B. Morse Jr.
