AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
2 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Cornelia O. Barnes v. Frank Williams, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama · Alabama · Jun 30, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Court unable to locate Rogers v. Wells Fargo as cited; citation appears fabricated. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to Safeco used to support that automobile dealers are subject to §1681m(a); court found the pin cite and proposition unsupported by Burr. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to Miller relied on for individual liability under ECOA/FCRA, but court found Miller does not support that proposition.
Judges: Corey Landon Maze
AI-related case
Bridgett Watson Adams, et al. v. 3M Company
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama · Alabama · Apr 20, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited “Jarrod Johnson v. Water Light & Sinking Fund Comm’n…, 74 F.4th 1308, 1313–17 (11th Cir. 2023)” for PFAS-standing language; court found the citation led to unrelated authority and the claimed PFAS discussion does not exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs quoted Gonsalvez but the court identified the passage as a misquote/false quote that did not match the actual language of Gonsalvez v. Celebrity Cruises. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs attributed a shortened/altered quotation to Ex parte Abbott Laboratories that materially differed from the actual opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs quoted Ex parte McKesson Corporation in a way that the court identified as an inaccurate or edited quotation not matching the opinion's actual language. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiffs relied on Cook v. Randolph Cty., 573 F.3d 1143, 1150-51 (11th Cir. 2009) to support a Rule 15 amendment entitlement, but Cook concerned remand and summary judgment—not Rule 15 amendment standards; the case was misread/misapplied. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited Payton v. Monsanto, 801 So. 2d 829, 835-36 (Ala. 2001) claiming it sup…
Judges: Corey Landon Maze
