United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

6 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

In the Interest of Q.C. and P.C., Children

Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · Jul 30, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's original opening brief contained a citation to a nonexistent case; the court identified the citation as nonexistent when reviewing the brief. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant's amended opening brief cited portions of case law that did not exist and quoted statements nowhere to be found in the cited case law; the court pointed out the misquotations and non-existent authorities.

Judges: Bonnie Sudderth, Dabney Bassel, J. Wade Birdwell

Party using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Shaddai Harris v. Iliac, LLC

Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · Jul 16, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | The opinion identifies an inaccurate citation Harris relied on—'Valdez v. Robertson, No. 01-19-00624-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 5211...'—and states the citation is incorrect and does not support her proposition.

Judges: Brian Walker, J. Wade Birdwell

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

In the Interest of Q.C. and P.C., Children

Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · Jul 9, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief included a citation to a nonexistent case; court flagged the citation as nonexistent and treated it as part of the brief's procedural deficiencies. || False Quotes: Case Law | Amended opening brief quoted statements not found in the cited authorities; court found the brief cited to portions of case law 'that did not exist' and included quotations 'nowhere to be found' in the cited cases.

Judges: Bonnie Sudderth, Dabney Bassel, J. Wade Birdwell

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Paris v. Paris

Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · Jun 25, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Jackson v. Jackson, 624 S.W.3d 630, 639 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2021, no pet.), which the court could not locate and deemed likely AI‑hallucinated; the court did not rely on it.

Judges: J. Wade Birdwell

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda

Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · May 28, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a nonexistent case 'In re Katherine S., 118 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex. 2003)'; the court determined the case does not exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to Lane Bank that does not appear in that opinion; the court noted the quoted language is not found in Lane Bank and the case stands for a narrower proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited PNS Stores v. Rivera for a broad due-process proposition; the court explained the cited opinion concerned summary-judgment/jurisdictional issues and does not support the appellant's proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited In re D.W. for the proposition that courts commit reversible error when ignoring objections to procedural misconduct; the court observed the cited opinion addressed family-code and termination issues and does not support that broad proposition.

Judges: J. Wade Birdwell

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

K.C. v. D.R.

Texas 2nd Court of Appeals · Texas · Apr 30, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not appear to exist (listed by court). || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not appear to exist (listed by court). || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not appear to exist; court could not locate the citation and noted appellant repeated it. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant provided a purported quote attributed to an existing case that the court found does not exist in that opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant misrepresented the holding of an existing case, claiming it reversed a protective order when the court actually affirmed. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited multiple existing cases that the court found did not support the propositions for which they were cited.

Judges: J. Wade Birdwell

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗