AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
2 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Suiter v. GM - General Motors, LLC
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia · Virginia · Mar 12, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Suiter cited numerous case authorities that the court found to be fabricated or nonexistent; GM moved to strike the filings on that basis. || False Quotes: Case Law | Suiter included quotations attributed to cited cases that the court determined do not appear in those cases (nonexistent quotes). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court observed that several cited cases were mischaracterized or quoted inaccurately, reflecting characteristics of generative-AI outputs.
Judges: Jasmine Hyejung Yoon
AI-related case
Scott M. Boger v. City of Harrisonburg, Virginia, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia · Virginia · Dec 9, 2025
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Snider Int’l Corp. v. City of Norfolk, 739 F.3d 140, 150 (4th Cir. 2014)'; the court could not identify a case by that name and noted the reporter corresponds to Snider Int’l Corp. v. Town of Forest Heights, Md., 739 F.3d 140, which does not support plaintiff's assertion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language he attributed to Connelly v. Steel Valley Sch. Dist., 706 F.3d 209, 216 (3d Cir. 2013); the court found the quoted language appears to have been fabricated and does not appear in that opinion.
Judges: Jasmine Hyejung Yoon
