AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

Source: Damien Charlotin

1,395Cases

837Judge-case associations

551Judges

164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

2 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · California · Jul 2, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff withdrew several cited authorities that the Notice of Errata states do not exist. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff withdrew several existing authorities that, according to the Notice of Errata, do not support the propositions for which they were cited.

Judges: John F. Walter

Order to Show CauseParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Song Dow Lee, et al. v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · California · May 7, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs included a non-existent quotation and citation presented as from 'BPi Bright Power, Inc. v. Umpqua Holding Corp., 669 F.Supp.3d 904, 906 (N.D. Cal. 2023).' The court noted the citation/quote did not exist. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiffs misrepresented the holding of the cited case by quoting that the court recognized Article 4A 'addresses the mechanics of executing wire transfers and payment orders,' excluding banks' pre-contractual representations; the court flagged this as a misrepresentation.

Judges: John F. Walter

Order to Show CauseParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗