United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

Source: Damien Charlotin

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

3 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Danielle Maloit v. Frank Daniel Maloit

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado · Colorado · Jul 29, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in her response; Court determined the case does not exist (AI-generated hallucination). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in her response; Court determined the case does not exist (AI-generated hallucination). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in her response; Court determined the case does not exist (AI-generated hallucination). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in her response; Court determined the case does not exist (AI-generated hallucination). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in her response; Court determined the case does not exist (AI-generated hallucination). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in her response; Court determined the case does not exist (AI-generated hallucination). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this authority in her response; Court determined the authority could not be located and does not exist (AI-generated hallucination). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff misattributed or inaccurately quoted language from cited cases and misrepresented associated legal concepts; Court no…

Judges: Kathryn A Starnella

Order to Show CauseParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Y.S. v. John Doe et al.

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado · Colorado · Nov 19, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'In re Subpoena to Coinbase, Inc., No. 17-MC-80244, 2018 WL 1898913, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2018)' to support delayed notice; the court found this cited opinion does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'In re Subpoena to Coinbase, Inc., 2023 WL 177977, at 2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2023)'; the court could not locate this citation on Westlaw and noted only an unrelated CourtListener docket for 'In re: Coinbase, Inc.' (23-1779). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 964 F.3d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 2020) as approving 'delayed notice' to prevent targets from knowing of subpoenas; the court observed Strike 3 contains no discussion of preventing a subpoena target from learning of the subpoena and therefore does not support plaintiff's proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Hard Drive Productions, Inc., 809 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (N.D. Cal. 2011) as supporting nondisclosure/delayed notice; the court found Hard Drive authorized notice to subscribers (the opposite of delayed notice) and does not support plaintiff's position. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Arista Records LL…

Judges: Kathryn A Starnella

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗