United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

8 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis

Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Aug 4, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Submitted 23 fictitious decisions across 19 submissions; court concluded these were fabricated AI-generated authorities and constituted frivolous conduct. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Materially misstated holdings of at least 83 genuine decisions across multiple filings; court found these misrepresentations extensive and non-trivial. || False Quotes: Case Law | Included multiple fictitious quotations and fabricated excerpts in filings; court treated fake quotations as aggravating evidence of AI hallucination misuse. || Fabricated: Case Law | Created and submitted additional fabricated authorities after opposing counsel identified the problem, exacerbating the misconduct.

Judges: Heela D. Capell

Monetary Sanction; Bar ReferralParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC

Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Jun 16, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. || Fabricate…

Judges: Devin P. Cohen

Sanctions HearingParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd

Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Apr 24, 2026

False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Klapper v. Graziano, 41 Misc 3d 401, 410 (Sup Ct 2013)' and attributed the statement that releases 'are enforceable and are not to be lightly set aside,' but the quoted language does not appear in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Clark v. Velsiplast Corp., 88 A.D.2d 859 (1st Dep't 1982)' and quoted from it, but the citation is incorrect (actual case is People v Ford, 88 A.D.2d 859) and the quoted language does not appear. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited 'Shah v. Levy, 56 A.D.3d 574 (2d Dep't 2008)' for a proposition unrelated to that action; citation misrepresents the authority's relevance. || Fabricated: Case Law | Submission contained numerous other phantom cases and lengthy fabricated quotes generated by AI, as noted by the court.

Judges: Gina Abadi

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Espinoza v. M&R Const. Group Inc.

Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Mar 19, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants cited 'Parrelli v. Temple Beth El of Great Neck, 304 A.D.2d 788, 789 [2d Dept 2003]' in support; court and plaintiff's counsel found no such case and the citation pointed to unrelated material.

Judges: Devin P. Cohen

Upcoming SanctionsParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum

Kings County Supreme Court · New York · Feb 9, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent (or incorrectly cited) Risucci decision; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci case that did not contain the quoted language. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum cited a non-existent case 'Kennedy v Kennedy, 192 AD3d 111 (1st Dept 2020)'; court found the case does not exist and ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned. || False Quotes: Case Law | Defendant's brief cited 'Risucci v Homayoon, 122 AD3d 700 (2nd Dept 2014)' and quoted language; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci (122 AD2d 260 (2d Dept 1986)) and the quoted language does not appear in that opinion, indicating a false quotation or misrepresentation.

Judges: Dweynie E. Paul, Paul A. Goetz

Order to Show CauseParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Burnett v. The City of New York

Kings County Supreme Court · New York · Dec 31, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited a nonexistent case (Backus v. City of Rochester, 148 AD3d 1697 [4th Dept 2017]); the court reported it was unable to locate the case and ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned.

Judges: Dweynie E. Paul, Paul A. Goetz

Order to Show CauseParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC

Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Dec 4, 2025

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed seven quotations to cases that do not contain those quotations; the court found these to be fabricated or misattributed quotations relied on in his motion papers. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Loeb v Loeb, 84 AD2d 591 (2d Dept 1981)” and attributed a quotation to it; the court found 84 AD2d 591 corresponds to unrelated 3rd Dept decisions (Sanginario; First Depot) and the cited Loeb decision/quotation does not exist as represented. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a dozen purported authorities that the court and opposing counsel identified as nonexistent case citations listed in defense filings (NYSCEF Doc No. 102).

Judges: Reginald A. Boddie

Costs OrderParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Basko v. Civic Sherman LLC

Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term · New York · Sep 18, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Reply papers contained a fictitious/misleading citation and fabricated parenthetical attribution concerning Torres v. New York City Hous. Auth.; court found the reporter pages and holding misstated and not supported by the cited decision.

Judges: Devin P. Cohen

Upcoming SanctionParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗