AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
2 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Willie C. Fortune v. CTA Certified Transmission
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District · Missouri · Sep 1, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | The appellant cited three completely fictitious cases in his brief. One was cited five times, another twice, and the third once; the court found that the nonexistent authorities constituted spurious citations and a flagrant violation of the duty of candor. || Misrepresented: Case Law | The appellant repeatedly cited real cases for propositions unrelated to the legal issues and substantively misstated the legal propositions stated in other cited cases. The court characterized these misrepresentations as an abuse of the judicial system. || Misrepresented: Case Law | The appellant used inaccurate pin cites, including citations to factual and procedural-history pages that contained no supporting legal proposition.
Judges: Janet Sutton, Lisa White Hardwick
Appeal dismissed for pervasive briefing deficiencies, fictitious cases, and inaccurate legal citations.Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗ AI-related case
State of Missouri v. Timothy H. Moore
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District · Missouri · Jun 30, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Three citations in Moore's brief were completely fictitious (nonexistent cases) as identified by the court. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Thirteen citations cited cases that bore no relation to the legal issues for which they were cited. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Five cases were pin-cited to pages that are in the Factual and Procedural History or West Headnotes sections, not to legal propositions or holdings.
Judges: Lisa White Hardwick, W. Douglas Thomson
