AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

Source: Damien Charlotin

1,395Cases

837Judge-case associations

551Judges

164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

5 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLC

New York County Supreme Court · New York · May 28, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Citibank, N.A. v Velazquez, 150 AD3d 813, 814 [2d Dept 2017], but the correct authority is Citibank, N.A. v Wood, 150 AD3d 813, 814 [2d Dept 2017]; court rejected the miscitation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Guevara, 137 AD3d 460, 461 [1st Dept 2016], but the proper citation is D. Penguin Bros. Ltd. v Natl. Black United Fund, Inc., 137 AD3d 460, 461 [1st Dept 2016]; court found the citation does not support defendants' proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited 'Fidelity Natl. Title, Ins. Co. v Valtech Research, Inc., 73 AD3d 521, 522 [1st Dept 2010]' which yielded no results; Westlaw/Lexis correct the cite to Popowich v Korman, 73 AD3d 515, 522 [1st Dept 2010]. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Russo, 121 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2014] for a proposition not found in the reported decision; the court identified the actual decision as Sari v Alishaev Bros., Inc., 121 AD3d 506 [1st Dept 2014] which does not support defendants' claim. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited OneWestBank, FSB v Kanapathipillai, 188 AD3d 982, 9…

Judges: Lyle E. Frank

Adverse Costs OrderParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

DOE, J. et al v. The Trustees of Columbia University

New York County Supreme Court · New York · May 5, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioners' papers included fabricated case citations generated by AI; opposing counsel pointed them out and counsel withdrew and apologized.

Judges: Lyle E. Frank

Counsel apologizedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Wheat v. Vichie

New York County Supreme Court · New York · Nov 3, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's papers cite 'Sosnovska v. Belle World Beauty, Inc.' as a First Department decision; the court found the case to be non-existent and warned that further false representations could result in sanctions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's papers cite 'Sosnovska v. Belle World Beauty, Inc.' as a Second Department decision; the court found the citation likewise fictional and cautioned the pro se litigant. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's papers included two citations to an apparently non-existent case, Sosnovska v. Belle World Beauty, Inc., cited as both a First Department and a Second Department case; the Court identified these as fictional. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff repeatedly misstated the holdings of cited authorities in his filings; the Court noted multiple instances of mischaracterized case holdings.

Judges: Lyle E. Frank

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Anderson v. Akam Associates, Inc.

New York County Supreme Court · New York · Oct 27, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Matter of Oppenheimer v. City of New York, 193 A.D.2d 457 [1st Dept 1993]'; the Court reviewed and confirmed no such case exists and that the intended case did not support plaintiff's proposition.

Judges: Lyle E. Frank

Upcoming SanctionsParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Fora Financial Asset Securitization v. Teona Ostrov Public Relations

New York County Supreme Court · New York · Jan 24, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant’s reply papers cited non-existent cases; the Court struck those citations and their propositions. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendant’s reply papers included citations that led to different cases than represented; the Court struck them. || False Quotes: Case Law | Defendant’s reply papers quoted language that does not appear in any cited case; the Court struck the quotation and its proposition.

Judges: Lyle E. Frank

WarningParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗