AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
3 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Snisko v. Cascade Funding Mortgage Trust HB4
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · Illinois · Aug 19, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited In re Chi., Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R. Co., 6 F.3d 1184, 1188 (7th Cir. 1993) for a 'de novo' standard, but the case actually supports abuse-of-discretion review for permissive abstention (misstated precedent). || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant included a quotation attributed to In re Tarnow that does not appear in that opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant apparently quoted or attributed propositions to In re Aguirre and In re Boughton that do not appear in those cases, per appellee and the court.
Judges: Manish Suresh Shah
AI-related case
Faisal Rahman v. Michael J. Burton, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · Illinois · Apr 30, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a case called 'Swayne' that the court determined does not exist; court identified the citation as fabricated in assessing Rule 11 concerns. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported Seventh Circuit case called 'Kitchen' that the court determined does not exist at the plaintiff's citation; court treated it as a fabricated citation.
Judges: Manish Suresh Shah
AI-related case
Bettis v. Gaston
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · Illinois · Feb 9, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Dvorak v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, 941 F.3d 936 (7th Cir. 2019)', which the court (as defendants pointed out) appears not to exist; court flagged this as an AI-style fabricated citation. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Brooks v. Ross, 578 F.3d 574 (7th Cir. 2009) that does not exist in that opinion; court identified this as a false quotation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited LeBeau v. Taco Bell, Inc., 892 F.2d 605 (7th Cir. 1989) as supporting the two-dismissal rule, but the court found the opinion does not discuss that rule (misrepresented precedent).
Judges: Manish Suresh Shah
