Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
The suspension was later reported by local media (see, e.g., here).
Judges: Jeffrey J. Funke, John R. Freudenberg, Jonathan J. Papik, Stephanie F. Stacy, William B. Cassel
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent Nebraska case to support the discovery rule; court could not locate the authority. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent Nebraska decision regarding notice and commercial breach; court could not locate the authority. || Misrepresented: Doctrinal Work | Plaintiff cited a Restatement provision with wording the court found to be hallucinated / inaccurate compared to the official Restatement text. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff used an incorrect/invalid Westlaw citation for a Nebraska Supreme Court case (led to unrelated material); the correct citation differs. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a Nebraska case that appears not to exist to support spoliation sanctions. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a proposition to Stones v. Sears that the case does not contain; the pincite actually addresses Magnuson‑Moss issues. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Lewy for the discovery rule and future-performance proposition though the 8th Cir. opinion does not stand for that proposition. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff presented a sentence as a direct quote from the Lev…
Judges: James M. Masteller