Search 691 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
814 judge-case associations across 549 judges and 187 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Citibank, N.A. v Velazquez, 150 AD3d 813, 814 [2d Dept 2017], but the correct authority is Citibank, N.A. v Wood, 150 AD3d 813, 814 [2d Dept 2017]; court rejected the miscitation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Defen…
Judges: Lyle E. Frank
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's draft brief contained numerous citations to non-existent cases; the U.S. District Court characterized those citations as hallucinations produced by ChatGPT or a similar AI.
Judges: Melissa T. Lewis
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioners' papers included fabricated case citations generated by AI; opposing counsel pointed them out and counsel withdrew and apologized.
Judges: Lyle E. Frank
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Defense counsel cited "Gildea v Sheridan" in the opposition brief; the court found no such case and treated it as an AI-generated fabrication. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defense counsel cited "Jones Wolf Realty v 2 E. 79th St. Corp." in…
Judges: Jennifer G. Schecter
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent (or incorrectly cited) Risucci decision; plaintiffs l…
Judges: Paul A. Goetz
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's papers relied on non-existent legal authority (fabricated cases); court found these authorities did not exist and attributed them to misuse of generative AI. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited several existing cas…
Judges: James E. d'Auguste
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited a nonexistent case (Backus v. City of Rochester, 148 AD3d 1697 [4th Dept 2017]); the court reported it was unable to locate the case and ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned.
Judges: Paul A. Goetz
AI-related case
By interim order dated March 17, 2025 the court struck defendants' opposition and cross-motion after finding the filings, drafted with AI, contained hallucinated (fabricated) case citations. The court treated the motion as unopposed thereafter.
Judges: Nancy M. Bannon
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's papers cite 'Sosnovska v. Belle World Beauty, Inc.' as a First Department decision; the court found the case to be non-existent and warned that further false representations could result in sanctions. || Fabricated: Case Law…
Judges: Lyle E. Frank
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Matter of Oppenheimer v. City of New York, 193 A.D.2d 457 [1st Dept 1993]'; the Court reviewed and confirmed no such case exists and that the intended case did not support plaintiff's proposition.
Judges: Lyle E. Frank