AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
3 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Sana Hazina Butler v. Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · New York · May 22, 2026
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rate Technology Inc. v. Speakeasy Inc.' with an incorrect citation and relied on it for a point; the actual case (Rates Tech. Inc. v. Speakeasy, Inc., 685 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2012)) concerns a settlement agreement and patent validity, not the cited proposition.
Judges: Robyn F. Tarnofsky
AI-related case
Sana Hazina Butler v. Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · New York · Apr 30, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Maersk, Inc. v. Neewra, Inc. with quoted language the court determined does not appear in that opinion; case exists but does not support the cited proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Parisie v. Greer, which exists but the court noted it has nothing to do with removal (misstated relevance). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Whitaker v. American Telecasting, which involves removal but does not support the specific proposition about filing a removed complaint as an exhibit; court noted misstatement of holding. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rong Zhu v. BNP Paribas, 997 F. Supp. 2d 242 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)', which the court found does not exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed quoted language to Granny Goose Foods, but the court found the quoted language does not appear in that opinion; case exists but does not support the cited proposition. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Azer v. Connell and included quoted language the court found does not appear in the opinion; case exists but the quote is not in it and it is unrelated to the removal issue cited.
Judges: Robyn F. Tarnofsky
AI-related case
Viral Bhagat v. Anuja Sharad Shah
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · New York · Apr 6, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited "In re SunEdison, Inc. Sec. Litig., 314 F.R.D. 139, 143 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)"; the court could not locate the case or quoted text on docket or Westlaw and concluded the citation was an AI-generated fabrication.
Judges: Robyn F. Tarnofsky