AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

Source: Damien Charlotin

1,395Cases

837Judge-case associations

551Judges

164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

4 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri · Missouri · Aug 25, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | November 18 filing (Doc. 53) included citations to nonexistent cases; AndDone moved for Rule 11 show cause. || False Quotes: Case Law | November 18 filing contained quotations attributed to authority that the court found to be improper or unsupported. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Gaines inaccurately represented that the Bankruptcy Court 'expressly held' AndDone's claim was discharged, but the Bankruptcy Court made no such ruling (Doc. 53-3).

Judges: Roseann Ambrosia Ketchmark

Order to Show CauseParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al. (2)

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri · Missouri · Jun 22, 2026

False Quotes: Case Law | Quotation attributed to 'Bonin v. Chadron Community Hospital, 28 F.4th at 1039-40' not found in that order; true case appears to be Bonin v. Chadron Community Hospital, 163 F.R.D. 656 (D. Neb. 1995), and the quoted language does not appear there. || False Quotes: Case Law | Citation 'Watson v. Argee Transportation Co., 378 F.3d 993, 999 (8th Cir. 2004)' is incorrect; the correct case is Watson v. Argee Transport Co., No. 4:23-CV-00722-NCC, 2024 WL 1514294 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 5, 2024), and the quoted language does not appear in the correctly cited opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation 'Rodriguez v. United States, 823 F.3d 593, 600-01 (8th Cir. 2016)' appears not to exist and misreferences 823 F.3d 593 (which is an 11th Cir. decision, Foudy v. Miami-Dade County); the Court could not locate the cited Eighth Circuit case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Case cited as 'Earth to Go v. Midwest Coal, 682 S.W.3d 424 (Mo. App. 2024)' is incorrect; the correct citation is Earth to Go v. City of Richland, 706 S.W.3d 310 (Mo. Ct. App. 2025). || False Quotes: Case Law | Quotations attributed to Harvey v. Timber Resources, 37 S.W.3d 814, 818 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001) were not f…

Judges: Roseann Ambrosia Ketchmark

Order to Show CauseParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri · Missouri · Jun 3, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified Plaintiffs cited Stroud with an incorrect docket/citation and relied on it for a proposition the case did not support; court explained correct citation and that Stroud did not stand for Plaintiffs' asserted proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found Plaintiffs mis-cited Affordable Communities (wrong case number/Westlaw cite/date) and that the cited decision differed from Plaintiffs' representation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court flagged Plaintiffs' incorrect citation to Family Dollar/Tsai (wrong case number and Westlaw cite) and that Plaintiffs' briefing misstated the authority. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court concluded Plaintiffs relied on Cook v. MFA Livestock for a 'single phone call' proposition although Cook did not involve or support that fact pattern; court characterized Plaintiffs' use as inaccurate/misleading. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found Plaintiffs cited Institutional Food as supporting a broad proposition about Missouri law prohibiting interference based on discriminatory motives, but the cited decision did not support that proposition and was inapposite. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court no…

Judges: Roseann Ambrosia Ketchmark

AdmonishmentParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

United States v. Clint Travis Rodgers

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri · Missouri · Feb 10, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited decisions that granted release for medical conditions that are facially dissimilar to Defendant's conditions; Court found these distinguishable and not supportive. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited cases that actually denied compassionate release (presented as supportive authority for medical conditions); the Court flagged these as misleading. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel relied on a district-court decision that was later reversed on appeal but cited it as supportive; the Court noted the reversal undermines its use as authority. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited cases that granted compassionate release, but did so based on non-medical family or sentencing-change reasons—not the medical grounds counsel relied upon; Court found those citations inapposite.

Judges: Roseann Ambrosia Ketchmark

AdmonishmentParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗