AI-related case
Postma v. York
Fabricated: Case Law | Motion to Compel (D0143) cited a nonexistent case 'Midwest Recovery Servs. v. Cooperatives Ins. Co., 785 N.W.2d 169 (Iowa Ct. App. 2010)'; court could not locate citation and concluded it was likely manufactured. || Fabricated: Case Law | Motion to Gain Access to Documents (D0143) cited 'Hickman v. Sacred Heart Corp., 653 N.W.2d 522 (Iowa 2002)', which the court could not locate and appears to be an AI-created mis-citation possibly conflating State v. Watson decisions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Motion to Dismiss (D0150) cited 'Kellogg v. Iowa State Bank of Wapello, 189 N.W.2d 354 (Iowa 1971)', a misattributed citation (actual reporter reference tied to an unrelated Michigan case) and not relevant to the issues asserted. || Fabricated: Case Law | Resistance (D0164) cited 'Niemann v. Breen, 641 N.W.2d 146 (Iowa Ct. App. 2002)', which the court found does not exist and corresponds to a South Dakota case instead; cited to support pro se leniency. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff identified approximately ten additional instances across York's filings where cases or citations were nonexistent or did not support the propositions attributed to them.
Judges: Sarah Crane