AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
2 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Curtin v. Watts, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina · North Carolina · May 20, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Sinochem inaccurately, claiming it held that a court lacking jurisdiction "must dismiss, it cannot transfer." The court found this quotation fabricated and contrary to Sinochem, 549 U.S. 422 (2007). || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff misquoted Christianson as stating a transferee court "should not revisit a jurisdictional ruling made by a coordinate court unless it is clearly erroneous," which the court found to be a fabrication of Christianson, 486 U.S. 800 (1988).
Judges: Thomas D. Schroeder
AI-related case
Bank of America v. Mapp
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina · North Carolina · May 15, 2026
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Cited 28 U.S.C. § 1348 as broadly granting jurisdiction over any action by or against a bank; court found this to be a misrepresentation of the statute's scope. || Fabricated: Case Law | Filings contained citations to non-existent case law (fabricated citations); court noted such fabricated citations and referenced authorities sanctioning that conduct. || False Quotes: Case Law | Submitted fictitious quotations and misrepresentations of case law in briefing and attachments.
Judges: Thomas D. Schroeder
