United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

5 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (2)

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington · Washington · Aug 18, 2026

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff's counsel (Jocelyn Stewart) used Claude or ChatGPT to generate citation data provided as an appendix/submission to the court and experts, resulting in numerous false citations in filings and expert exhibits. || Fabricated: Other | AI-generated formatted citation table appended to expert reports of James Kababick and Ronald Shippee contained numerous false/fabricated academic citations; plaintiff admitted providing the same AI-generated citation table to both experts. || Fabricated: Other | Dr. Gabriel Holguin's expert report contained multiple AI-generated fabricated citations to academic articles in portions later withdrawn; the Court found these hallucinated citations undermined his credibility and rendered his opinions unreliable.

Judges: Tiffany Mae Cartwright

Expert Brief excluded/struckParty using AI: OtherRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Dana Serine Greene v. GSK PLC

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington · Washington · Jan 29, 2026

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Brockmeyer v. May but the authority does not support the proposition or contain the quoted text; court identified it among inaccurate/misused citations. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Freedom Watch, Inc. v. OPEC but the opinion does not contain the text she quotes; court listed it as an inaccurate citation. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc. v. Porsche.net and allegedly misquoted or misapplied its text; court flagged it as not supporting her proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Gurung v. Malhotra but the text cited is not present in that authority; court included it among suspect citations. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited In re LLS Am., LLC but the court found the citation did not support her quoted text and listed it among problematic citations. || Fabricated: Case Law | The opinion contains multiple citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist; Editor's Note preserves these invalid citations as part of the record.

Judges: Tiffany Mae Cartwright

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Lareina A. Sauls v. Pierce County, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington · Washington · Oct 30, 2025

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on United States v. Mississippi, 82 F.4th 387 (5th Cir. 2023) as supporting the proposition that disability-based sanctions/adverse inferences are irreversible; the Court stated that the cited case does not discuss or support that inference.

Judges: Tiffany Mae Cartwright

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗