United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

7 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Apr 29, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Ellsworth v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 148 Ariz. 17, 19 (App. 1985),” which the Court found does not exist; the Court identified a likely intended real case as Ellsworth v. Am. Arb. Ass'n, 148 P.3d 983 (Utah 2006) (arbitration issue). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Aguilar v. ASARCO” at 780 F.3d 1101 as a Ninth Circuit case; the Court noted no such Ninth Circuit opinion exists and that 780 F.3d 1101 corresponds to Lary v. Trinity Phys. Fin. & Ins. Services (11th Cir. 2015).

Judges: Diane Joyce Humetewa

Motion Struck; WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Gerow v. Falcone

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Feb 20, 2026

Fabricated: Case Law | Pro se plaintiff cited AROK Construction Co. v. Shipley, 235 Ariz. 163, 166, 329 P.3d 1051, 1054 (Ct. App. 2014); the Court found that the case does not exist at that citation and could not locate the quoted language, and thus did not rely on it.

Judges: David G. Campbell

Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Wireless Investors LLC v. Semtech Incorporated, et al.

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Dec 18, 2025

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed quotations to authorities that the Court found did not exist in the cited opinions (nonexistent quotes). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff misstated the holdings of cited cases and relied on authorities that did not support its arguments.

Judges: Diane Joyce Humetewa

WarningParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Oct 29, 2025

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Johnson v. City of Shelby that does not appear in that decision; Court notes the quoted text is not in the cited opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pearson v. Callahan while characterizing it as supporting the opposite proposition; Court explains Pearson actually endorses early resolution of qualified-immunity questions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent Ninth Circuit opinion to support the proposition that qualified-immunity dismissals are premature; Court and defendants could not locate the case and characterized it as hallucinatory.

Judges: John Joseph Tuchi

Show Cause OrderParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Sep 5, 2025

The court granted Plaintiff's motion to strike portions of the Opening Brief after Defendant raised concerns that the brief included a non-existent quotation attributed to an existing case, a mischaracterization of an existing case, a citation to a non-existent case, and a miscitation of a case that did not address the asserted issue. The court noted counsel had been sanctioned in a separate case for citation-related deficiencies consistent with AI-generated hallucinations. The stricken portions were removed and the ALJ decision was affirmed.

Judges: James A. Teilborg

Portions of the Opening Brief were strickenParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Arnaoudoff v. Tivity Health Incorporated

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Mar 11, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff’s objection repeatedly cited nonexistent cases, which the Court labeled as fake cases and agreed to disregard after Defendants flagged the issue. || Fabricated: Case Law | To argue that lack of counsel made the settlement involuntary, Plaintiff relied on nonexistent case law; the Court found no such authority exists. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Alcaide v. Thomas as supporting her position on unenforceability, but the case actually held the parties were bound by their settlement. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff admitted she used ChatGPT and external tools that produced erroneous, fake case citations in her objections.

Judges: Diane Joyce Humetewa

Court ignored fake citations and granted motion to correct the recordParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Transamerica Life v. Williams

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · Arizona · Sep 6, 2024

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited case does not exist and was used to support Williams’s arguments. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited Tenth Circuit case does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited Fourth Circuit case does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited Ninth Circuit case does not exist. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Court held Williams misapplied these statutes; they concern assignment of payment for services and nonforfeiture options, not insurer interest obligations.

Judges: Roslyn O. Silver

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗