Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent Fourth Circuit opinion as support; court could not locate the opinion and concluded the citation was fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a Maryland appellate/decisional citation that the court could not locate.
Judges: Julie Rebecca Rubin
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff misstated the pincite and import of Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Div.; court found the plaintiff's pincites/description did not accurately represent the case though Aguilar is a real case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff misdescribed the holding and import of Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs.; court found the citation was imprecise and did not support the plaintiff's asserted proposition.
Judges: Charles D Austin
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel again cited a non-existent case previously withdrawn; the Court noted the fabricated citation and admonished counsel.
Judges: Brendan Abell Hurson
AI-related case
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Plaintiff cited 'Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(5)' to demand redaction of her address; the Court found that this subsection does not exist and rejected the sealing request.
Judges: Matthew James Maddox
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's brief contained quotations attributed to cases that were inaccurate or from non-existent authorities; Defendants flagged the false quotations and the plaintiff filed a declaration addressing them. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's response brief included non-existent case citations; Defendants' reply pointed out the citations do not exist and the Court noted the issue.
Judges: Adam Ben Abelson
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to In re United States (4th Cir.); the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to Hahn v. United States (1883); the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.; the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a nonexistent quotation to Tutun v. United States (1926) and mischaracterized the case's holding; the quoted language does not appear and the cited case supports the opposite proposition. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported quotation from Taalebinezhaad v. Chertoff (D. Mass.) that does not exist in the cited pages, though the court did deny remand in that case.
Judges: Adam Ben Abelson
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case for the proposition that loss of one's home is irreparable; the court could not locate the opinion and identified the citation as likely AI-generated.
Judges: Julie Rebecca Rubin
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff (through counsel) relied on a non-existent case to support an argument; the Court found the citation fabricated and refused to consider the proposition drawn from it.
Judges: Stephanie Agli Gallagher
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a non-existent case, "United States v. $17,900 in U.S. Currency" (ECF No. 59 at 8); Court found this case does not appear to exist.
Judges: Adam Ben Abelson
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited "Eichholz v. Camp, 36 F.4th 908, 917 (4th Cir. 2022)"; Court noted the reporter information more closely matches an unrelated Ninth Circuit opinion and the citation is inaccurate. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited Holloway v. State, 232 Md. App. 272, 290 (2017) with a pinpoint page that does not exist (opinion ends at p.285) and relied on it for an unrelated proposition; Court noted the page and proposition are incorrect. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent decision as "Bush v. Lucas, 598 F. Supp. 3d 303, 316 (D. Md. 2022)"; Court found no such case at that citation and noted the closest match is a different 5th Circuit opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel quoted language attributed to Okwa v. Harper that does not appear in that opinion; Court observed the quoted language is absent from Okwa. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel mis-summarized or misquoted multiple Fourth Circuit cases (e.g., misquoting Colleton Preparatory Acad. and United States v. Moradi); Court flagged these misquotes in its opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel cited Haines v. Vogel as supporting that non-consensual sexualiz…
Judges: Brendan Abell Hurson