AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
4 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Harris v. St. Peter Investors, LLC et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · Minnesota · May 18, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Taylor v. City of Minneapolis, 202 F. Supp. 3d 933, 941–42 (D. Minn. 2016); the Court found this citation does not appear to exist and actually leads to an unrelated SD Indiana case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Berg v. Copeland, 2019 WL 1493461, at *5 (D. Minn. Apr. 4, 2019); the Court found this citation does not appear to exist and instead leads to an unrelated Colorado Court of Appeals case. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff provided a purported quotation attributed to Pfannenstiel Architects, Inc. v. Chouteau Petroleum Co.; the Court found the quoted language is not present in that opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff provided a purported quotation attributed to Johnson v. Dayton Elec. Mfg. Co.; the Court found the quoted language is not found in that opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff provided a purported quotation attributed to Stephenson v. El-Batrawi; the Court found the quoted language is not present in that opinion.
Judges: Laura Margarete Provinzino
AI-related case
Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · Minnesota · May 5, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found plaintiff's filings contained citations to non-existent cases and suggested generative AI produced fabricated case citations; no specific fabricated citations were identified in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court found quotations in the filings that do not appear in the cited cases (false quotes), indicating the plaintiff submitted inaccurate quotes likely generated by AI; no specific misquoted passages were reproduced in the opinion.
Judges: Patrick Joseph Schiltz
AI-related case
Leila Kasso v. Police Officers’ Federation of Minneapolis
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · Minnesota · Oct 21, 2025
The City argued—and the Court found—that the pro se plaintiff repeatedly cited nonexistent or inaccurately attributed caselaw likely generated by AI. The Court found these citations violated Rule 11, warned the plaintiff, and declined to award fees or impose sanctions. The court preserved the original incorrect citations in the opinion as part of the record.
Judges: Douglas L. Micko
AI-related case
Twyla Leach Minnesota DHS et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · Minnesota · Oct 17, 2025
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's supplementary memorandum included a quotation attributed to a cited case; the quoted language does not appear in that case and could not be located elsewhere — the court treated this as an apparent AI-generated hallucinated quotation.
Judges: Paul Arthur Magnuson
