AI-related case
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.
Order to Show Cause is here.
Judges: Ted Stewart
Two AI-ethics CLE courses; Monetary SanctionsParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗
AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
Case screener
Find an AI-related case
11 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Jack Ferm v. Agritech Properties, et al.
(Existence of hallucinations in drafting verified by myself thanks to PelAIkan.)
Judges: David Ogden Nuffer
AI-related case
Hack v. Preston et al
Misrepresented: Case Law | Reply brief relied on Hukill but provided an incorrect citation and mischaracterized the Tenth Circuit's analysis; court flagged the misrepresentation and warned about AI hallucinations.
Judges: David Ogden Nuffer
AI-related case
Carey v. Breakell et al.
The district court found multiple case citations in Plaintiff’s counsel’s Opposition could not be located on Westlaw and appeared to be fake (suggesting improper use of AI). The court explained that citation to non-existent opinions undermines filings and may violate Rule 11, but because it was transferring the case to Arizona it left investigation or sanctioning to the receiving judge rather than imposing relief itself.
Judges: Ann Marie McIff Allen
Party using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗
AI-related case
Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLC
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition cites Weatherly v. A.O. Smith Corp., 841 F. Supp. 2d 913, 920 (D.S.D. 2012), which the Court could not locate and determined likely to be an AI-generated fabricated opinion.
Judges: Ann Marie McIff Allen
AI-related case
Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.
Order to Show Cause is here.
Judges: Cecilia M. Romero
AI-related case
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Daniel Vett Finlayson; Michelle Johnson
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition contained multiple case citations the Court could not locate on Westlaw; counsel later confirmed clerical/research errors and the Court suggested possible improper AI use. || False Quotes: Case Law | Opposition included quotations attributed to cases that the Court could not verify; the quotations were inaccurate or unlocatable.
Judges: Ann Marie McIff Allen
AI-related case
Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a non-existent case as legal authority; court found the case did not exist and counsel admitted failing to verify after using AI. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a second non-existent case as legal authority; court determined it was fabricated and counsel accepted responsibility for not verifying. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing included a non-existent quotation attributed to authority; court determined the quote did not exist and was not verified by counsel after use of AI.
Judges: Ted Stewart
AI-related case
Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC v. Paul Evans, LLC, et al.
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition cited Rawson v. Mathews, 212 P.3d 752, 756–57 (Utah 2009) to support equitable tolling; court determined the opinion does not exist and called it a hallucinated case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition cited Equilon Enters. v. Ford Motor Co., 2010 UT 44, ¶ 37 for equitable tolling; court found the opinion does not exist and treated it as a fabricated citation. || False Quotes: Case Law | Opposition attributed language to Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Assocs., 483 U.S. 143 (1987) that does not appear in the opinion; court treated this as a false quotation/misattribution.
Judges: David Bruce Barlow
Order for counsel to read cited authorities and file a certification within 30 daysParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗