AI-related case
Shaw v. City of Portola, et al.
The Court was eventually satisfied that Counsel would fix the issues.
Judges: Dennis M. Cota
AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
Case screener
Find an AI-related case
6 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Juan Villalovos-Gutierrez, et al. v. Gerard Van de Pol, et al. (2)
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited this case in its opposition; the court found the cited case does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited this case in its opposition; the court found the cited case does not exist.
Judges: Carolyn K. Delaney
AI-related case
Daniel James Cummins v. Moises Becerra
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner's reply included a citation to 'Vuong' which, per petitioner's errata and the court, does not appear in publicly available legal databases and was identified as erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner's reply included a citation to 'Arellano' which, per petitioner's errata and the court, does not appear in publicly available legal databases and was identified as erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner's reply included a citation to 'Calderon' which, per petitioner's errata and the court, does not appear in publicly available legal databases and was identified as erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner's reply included a citation to 'Pham' which, per petitioner's errata and the court, does not appear in publicly available legal databases and was identified as erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | The motion and reply contain numerous other citations that either do not exist or do not support the propositions for which they were offered; the court found these bear the hallmarks of AI-generated 'hallucinated' cases.
Judges: Dena Michaela Coggins
AI-related case
Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed other filings by the attorney contained similar non-existent case citations.
Judges: Sheila K. Oberto
Party using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗
AI-related case
Juan Villalovos-Gutierrez, et al. v. Gerard Van De Pol (1)
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the citation “Ho v. Ernst & Young LLP, 2011 WL 7106622, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2011)” to be incorrect or not supporting the asserted proposition; flagged as possibly fictitious or mis-cited. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed “Lobaton v. City of San Diego, No. 3:15-cv-1416-GPC-DHB, *2020 WL 7334512, at 4 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2020)” appeared to be mis-cited or not a real/accurate authority for the proposition offered. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified “Gonzalez v. CoreCivic, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-00927-DAD-EPG, *2020 WL 4437167, at 3 (E.D. Cal. July 31, 2020)” as having an incorrect citation or not accurately reflecting an order filed in that case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted “Gonzalez v. CoreCivic, Inc., 2020 WL 4037167, at *3 (E.D. Cal. July 17, 2020)” was cited incorrectly or does not match the record in that matter. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the citation “Chavez v. SolarCity Corp., No. 13-cv-01797-JST, *2015 WL 1520065, at 2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)” to be incorrect or not supporting the explanatory phrase attributed to it.
Judges: Carolyn K. Delaney
AI-related case
Teniah Tercero v. Sacramento Logistics, LLC, et al.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a nonexistent Seventh Circuit opinion; court found no such published Seventh Circuit opinion under that citation. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attorney attributed a quotation to In re Loudermilch that does not appear there; court found the quoted language actually appears in Seedman (9th Cir.). || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel quoted language about lack of jurisdiction/compelling arbitration and attributed it to Atlantic Marine; the case discusses forum-selection clauses and does not contain the quoted language. || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a statement about liberal application of Rule 60(b)(6) to Ackermann; court found Ackermann does not contain that language. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited Tittjung as stating a judgment is void when rendered by a court lacking jurisdiction; court found Tittjung actually explains lack of subject-matter jurisdiction will not always render a judgment void, so the citation was misleading. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel quoted Beggerly as addressing Rule 60(b)(6); court found Beggerly does not discuss 60(b)(6) and the parenthetical was inaccurate. || Fabricated: Case Law | C…
Judges: Dena Michaela Coggins
Monetary sanction; Order to be served on client; State Bar notifiedParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗