United States Judicial Registry
KnowJudges.com
Menu

AI Abuse Court Cases

Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.

837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.

Source: Damien Charlotin

1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts

Case screener

Find an AI-related case

2 cases found · 10 maximum per page

AI-related case

United States of America v. Lorenzio Reshaud Simmons

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina · North Carolina · Oct 3, 2025

Fabricated: Case Law | Memorandum cited 'United States v. Hazel, 696 F.3d 473, 478 (4th Cir. 2012)' — court found no such Fourth Circuit case (citation appears fabricated). || Fabricated: Case Law | Memorandum cited 'United States v. Angel, 102 F.3d 1066 (4th Cir. 1996)' for a quoted rule; court found no such Fourth Circuit decision or matching quoted language. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Memorandum cited 'United States v. Brehm, 442 F.3d 1291, 1293 (4th Cir. 2006)' and attributed the quote 'any uncertainty should be resolved in the defendant's favor.' The court noted the cited Brehm reference is to a different circuit and does not contain that quoted language. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Memorandum cited 'United States v. Nealy, 232 F.3d 825, 829 (4th Cir. 2000)' for language about burdens the government cannot meet; court found the citation is to a different circuit and does not contain the asserted language. || False Quotes: Case Law | Memorandum cited 'United States v. Edwards, 188 F.3d 230, 232 (4th Cir. 1999)' and quoted that packaging weight should not be included; court found Edwards does not contain that quoted language (false quotation). || Misrepresented: Case Law |…

Judges: Louise W. Flanagan

Warning; Allowed to file corrected briefParty using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗

AI-related case

Letts v. Avidien Technologies

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina · North Carolina · Dec 16, 2024

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Truong v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC (2016),' which the court was unable to locate. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2013)' to support remand/diversity arguments; the court noted the D.D.C. case concerned the Sherman Act and did not discuss diversity jurisdiction or remand. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Saadeh v. Farouki (2011)' for remand based on local activities; the court explained the actual case (1997) addresses alienage diversity and is inapplicable here.

Judges: Brian Scott Meyers

WarningParty using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗