Search 691 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
814 judge-case associations across 549 judges and 187 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Brief cited a non-existent N.D. Tex. opinion to support a legal proposition; Court identified only an unrelated D.N.J. case by the same name and found the cited authority provided no support.
Judges: Brian Mckay
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Pamon cited McCarty v. United States, using the Westlaw-style citation 2015 WL 1543969, which the court could not locate and Pamon failed to produce a PDF for. || Fabricated: Case Law | Pamon cited Harris v. Dallas Cnty. Hosp. Dist., us…
Judges: Brantley David Starr
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Cargill Inc. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 825 F.3d 256 (5th Cir. 2016)'; the court found the case does not exist and counsel admitted the citation was generated by generative AI and unverified (see Notice of Errata, ECF No.…
Judges: Rebecca A. Rutherford
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case for the proposition that an "Overdraft Protection Plan constitutes 'credit'"; the court noted the case does not exist and declined to rely on it.
Judges: Sidney Allen Fitzwater
AI-related case
Amazon alleged that Allen's undisclosed use of AI produced non-existent case citations and hallucinated quotations; the court declined to sanction, warned Allen and required future compliance with local AI-disclosure rule.
Judges: Sidney Allen Fitzwater
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Brief contained multiple nonexistent legal citations generated by GAI; Court found the filings included 'nonexistent legal citations' and relied on opposing counsel's objections and investigation.
Judges: Brian Mckay
AI-related case
In a footnote, the court held: "The Court notes that citing non-existent case law might potentially warrant sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11(b) and 11(c). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)–(c). Because the plaintiff is pro se and the Court is dismi…
Judges: James Wesley Hendrix
AI-related case
AI UseThe Court noted that the appellant's argument section appeared to have been drafted by AI based on telltale errors (nonexistent cases, jump-cites into wrong jurisdictions, illogical structure). A recent Texas CLE on AI usage was cited by the Court to ex…
Judges: Brantley David Starr