Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
Case screener
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | The response asserted that Affordable Aerial Photography established that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court explained that the cited decision expressly declined to decide whether a renewed 21-day period applied and therefore did not support that proposition.
Judges: Yeney Hernandez
AI-related case
Plaintiff’s counsel included multiple purported IACP "Training Keys" in the Fifth Amended Complaint that later could not be verified and were conceded to be the product of unverified AI-augmented research (AI hallucinations). Defendant moved for Rule 11 sanctions; the Court denied the motion on procedural grounds because the safe-harbor service requirement was not satisfied. The Court found counsel’s reliance on unverified AI-generated material irresponsible, denied sanctions, and recommended referral of the signing attorneys to the Ad Hoc Committee for potential disciplinary review.
Judges: Marty Fulgueira-Elfenbein
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Meier ex rel. Meier to argue FSIA does not bar jurisdictional discovery; Court observed Meier concerns personal jurisdiction and does not reference FSIA, immunity, or discovery stays. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on In re Clerici as support for jurisdictional discovery/FSIA-related propositions; Court noted In re Clerici addresses 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and does not discuss FSIA, immunity, or stays of discovery. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited McCarthy v. Barnett Bank of Polk Cnty. as establishing the standard for staying discovery; Court explained McCarthy concerns media intervention/confidentiality and does not address motions to stay discovery.
Judges: Marty Fulgueira-Elfenbein
AI-related case
False Quotes: Case Law | Response contains fabricated quotations and paraphrases attributed to real cases across multiple pages; Court found quotations and legal concepts were fake and unreliable. || Misrepresented: Doctrinal Work | Advanced an AI-invented doctrinal claim that an association's 'concerted action' removes the need to plead a conspiracy or agreement; Court rejected this as invented law. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Included U.S. Anchor Manufacturing 'incorrectly' as support; Court noted the plaintiff acknowledged the inclusion was erroneous and that other cited cases were misapplied.
Judges: William Matthewman
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited Holden v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations, Inc., 98 F.4th 1359 with a pinpoint to page 1371; the court noted Holden ends at page 1369 and that the cited page does not exist, suggesting an AI-generated or otherwise fabricated citation.
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | The defendants' original response contained an apparent AI-generated hallucination (incorrect/crafted case citation); the Court notified defendants and they withdrew the response.
Judges: Shaniek Mills Maynard
AI-related case
Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint included citations the Court could not locate; Greenspring moved for sanctions citing those nonexistent authorities. The Court found pro se status, correction attempts, and voluntary dismissal counseled against sanctions and therefore recommended denying the motion.
Judges: Rodney Smith
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence. || False Quotes: Case Law | Response included quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions that do not appear in those opinions; Court identified multiple such misquotes. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court's Order to Show Cause listed at least ten instances across the Complaint and Response citing non-existent cases and quotes (AI-hallucinated authorities).
Judges: Rodolfo Armando Ruiz II
AI-related case
Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed that Solis v. Zenith Cap., LLC, No. 19-80730-CIV, 2019 WL 7376782 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 26, 2019), cited by defendants, appears not to exist; cited in defendants' response to support their position. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted another citation in defendants' response (PGA Nat'l Resort, LLC v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2016 WL 8716673, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 24, 2016)) appears to be non-existent or invalid.
Judges: Beth Francine Bloom
AI-related case
Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority. || False Quotes: Case Law | Proposed Sur-Reply and Response attribute quoted language to Cohen v. Cooper (20 So. 3d 453) that does not appear in that opinion; Court identified the misquote. || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel presented quotes drawn from Westlaw Keynotes as if they were verbatim text from opinions (examples include Rollins and Stewart), a misrepresentation the Court noted. || Fabricated: Case Law | Response cites 'Metropolitan Dade County v. Dyer, 315 So. 2d 442, 444 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)', which the Court found appears not to exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Response cites 'QBE Ins. Corp. v. Dome Constr. Corp., 10 So. 3d 676, 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)', another authority the Court determined appears to be nonexistent.
Judges: Cecilia M. Altonaga