AI Abuse Court Cases
Search 1,395 source-linked cases involving fabricated citations and other AI-generated legal errors.
837 judge-case associations across 551 judges and 164 courts.
Source: Damien Charlotin
1,395Cases
837Judge-case associations
551Judges
164Courts
6 cases found · 10 maximum per page
AI-related case
Izzeddin Ahmed Abdulghaffar Daghra v. Steve Hinkley, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan · Michigan · Jul 16, 2026
Fabricated: Case Law | Government cited a non-existent Sixth Circuit opinion 'Taylor v. Hott' at 724 F. App'x 387, 392; court found no such case and page 387 belongs to a different opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Government attributed the quoted language 'ask the court to reweigh the evidence underlying a bond decision or second-guess the Immigration Judge’s discretionary judgment' to the cited Taylor decision; court found no federal case containing that quote.
Judges: Hala Yalda Jarbou
AI-related case
Jonathan David Deak v. Mike Schuitema, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan · Michigan · Jun 18, 2026
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a sentence to Brown v. Matauszak that the court found does not appear in that opinion; the court noted this false quotation in a footnote and questioned whether it was an AI-generated hallucination. || Fabricated: Other | Multiple unverified citations in the plaintiff's filings were flagged by the court's Editor's Note as likely generated by AI and not attributable to the court; the citations were preserved in the record without links.
Judges: Paul Lewis Maloney
AI-related case
Checks Aciek Ateny Nai v. National Asset Mortgage, LLC, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan · Michigan · Mar 11, 2026
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Counsel for NAM included a fabricated quotation altering the language of 12 U.S.C. § 2614 in NAM's Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 117); quotation materially changed statute's plain meaning. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Same fabricated quotation of 12 U.S.C. § 2614 repeated in NAM's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 132); Plaintiff had previously notified NAM of the inaccuracy.
Judges: Jane Marie Beckering
Order to Show Cause satisfied; court declined to impose Rule 11 sanctions.Party using AI: Represented by counselRead the decision ↗ AI-related case
Kamps v. British Crown Corporation, et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan · Michigan · Jan 7, 2026
The court found the plaintiff's objections and central claims rooted in sovereign-citizen ideology and noted a fabricated quotation attributed to Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators, 3 U.S. 54 (1795). The R&R was adopted and the action dismissed as frivolous.
Judges: Paul Lewis Maloney
