AI-related case
In re Nicholia Cherry-Crockette
Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'In re Diamond, 346 B.R. 51 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)'; court could not locate the case and concluded it was likely a phantom case generated by AI. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Debtor cited 'In re Lisenby, 374 B.R. 271 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2007)'; court found a different citation (In re Lisenby, 2006 WL 802392 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. Feb. 22, 2006)) and concluded the debtor's citation was inaccurate and did not support her proposition.
Judges: Vincent F. Papalia
Party using AI: Self-representedRead the decision ↗
