Federal judge analytics
Compare federal district judges
Filter and sort public federal civil docket patterns across 1,201 matched judge profiles in 91 U.S. district courts.
No composite score. Every ranking uses the metric and filing window you select, with sample size and district context shown.
Federal case data current through June 30, 2026 · Sources vary by metric.
Federal civil dockets
Explore judge-level patterns
Every result links to the judge profile and its full analytics.
17 matching judge profiles · 5 maximum per page
Metrics describe public docket cohorts—not judicial quality, outcomes, or current workload.
| JudgeA–Z | Assigned civil cases | Filing cohort status | Median disposition | Leading case mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Baldwin VitterCurrent active · service 2019-05-29–present · Judge · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana | 98Attributed assigned cases; not workload | 92 active6 terminated · 6% | Not publishedSuppressed; N=6 | Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)5%365 Personal Inj. Prod. Liability2% |
| William Jerrol CrainCurrent active · service 2025-12-19–present · Judge · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana | 49Attributed assigned cases; not workload | 48 active1 terminated · 2% | Not publishedSuppressed; N=1 | 340 Marine4%446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other4% |
Read before comparing
Methodology and limits
Attribution. Profiles are matched by federal identifiers or a high-confidence exact name, court, and service overlap. Assigned and referred matters are separated; this explorer shows assigned cases.
Filing cohort. Active and terminated counts describe cases filed inside the selected window as of its end. They are not a clearance rate or a measure of current workload.
Disposition cohort. Median time uses terminated cases from the same attributed assigned filing cohort shown in the selected window. It is withheld below 10 qualifying cases and excludes land condemnation, prisoner petitions, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments, and enforcement of judgments.
No outcome claims. These data do not measure wins, losses, merits, judicial quality, or attorney success. Use the linked judge profiles and source records to verify legally significant information.