Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 502
- Any relief granted
- 19.7%
- Denied
- 80.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +10.2 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 6 · 83rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 65.8% · Median 72.8% · P75 79.8% · IQR 14.0%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 635
- Any relief granted
- 36.9%
- Denied
- 63.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 58.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +5.0 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 5 · 60th percentile
Judge outcome spread
5 qualifying direct judges · P25 45.7% · Median 63.1% · P75 82.2% · IQR 36.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 394
- Any relief granted
- 23.6%
- Denied
- 76.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +6.2 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 195
- Any relief granted
- 15.4%
- Denied
- 84.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +14.5 pp
Court denial position: 67th percentile
Judge outcome spread
15 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.6% · Median 82.9% · P75 90.9% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 407
- Any relief granted
- 50.4%
- Denied
- 49.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 51.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -1.8 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 340
- Any relief granted
- 13.2%
- Denied
- 86.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +4.8 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 6 · 67th percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.1% · Median 85.4% · P75 88.5% · IQR 5.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 195
- Any relief granted
- 40.5%
- Denied
- 59.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 65.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -5.9 pp
Court denial position: 31st percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.1% · P75 80.3% · IQR 20.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 149
- Any relief granted
- 6.7%
- Denied
- 93.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 83.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +10.2 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 638
- Any relief granted
- 31.2%
- Denied
- 68.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -2.8 pp
Court denial position: 54th percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 68.8% · P75 75.9% · IQR 13.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 380
- Any relief granted
- 24.2%
- Denied
- 75.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +5.7 pp
Court denial position: 33rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
15 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.6% · Median 82.9% · P75 90.9% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.