Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 247
- Any relief granted
- 54.3%
- Denied
- 45.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 76.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -30.8 pp
Court denial position: 6th percentile
Judge outcome spread
16 qualifying direct judges · P25 67.9% · Median 76.6% · P75 85.4% · IQR 17.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 720
- Any relief granted
- 26.9%
- Denied
- 73.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +1.6 pp
Court denial position: 62nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
21 qualifying direct judges · P25 64.4% · Median 69.8% · P75 76.9% · IQR 12.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 592
- Any relief granted
- 21.1%
- Denied
- 78.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 75.9%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +3.0 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 188
- Any relief granted
- 55.9%
- Denied
- 44.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 60.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -16.3 pp
Court denial position: Rank 8 of 8 · 13th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.5% · P75 78.6% · IQR 19.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 227
- Any relief granted
- 17.2%
- Denied
- 82.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 72.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +10.5 pp
Court denial position: 64th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 71.1% · Median 82.1% · P75 87.5% · IQR 16.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 461
- Any relief granted
- 69.2%
- Denied
- 30.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 42.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -11.2 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 138
- Any relief granted
- 10.1%
- Denied
- 89.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 55.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +34.2 pp
Court denial position: Rank 1 of 10 · 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
10 qualifying direct judges · P25 46.7% · Median 70.2% · P75 85.4% · IQR 38.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,680
- Any relief granted
- 33.3%
- Denied
- 66.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +19.0 pp
Court denial position: 67th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 130
- Any relief granted
- 63.8%
- Denied
- 36.2%
- Court denial benchmark
- 69.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -33.0 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 291
- Any relief granted
- 8.2%
- Denied
- 91.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 81.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +10.2 pp