Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 870
- Any relief granted
- 40.6%
- Denied
- 59.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.7 pp
Court denial position: 50th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 230
- Any relief granted
- 32.6%
- Denied
- 67.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 27.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +40.4 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 228
- Any relief granted
- 12.7%
- Denied
- 87.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 85.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +2.2 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 5 · 60th percentile
Judge outcome spread
5 qualifying direct judges · P25 81.2% · Median 87.3% · P75 89.5% · IQR 8.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 366
- Any relief granted
- 13.7%
- Denied
- 86.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 54.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +31.7 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 300
- Any relief granted
- 12.3%
- Denied
- 87.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 55.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +32.0 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 10 · 90th percentile
Judge outcome spread
10 qualifying direct judges · P25 46.7% · Median 70.2% · P75 85.4% · IQR 38.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 187
- Any relief granted
- 62.6%
- Denied
- 37.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 46.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -8.7 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 922
- Any relief granted
- 43.3%
- Denied
- 56.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 58.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -2.0 pp
Court denial position: Rank 5 of 7 · 43rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 55.0% · Median 60.3% · P75 65.6% · IQR 10.6%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 547
- Any relief granted
- 33.3%
- Denied
- 66.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 60.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +6.3 pp
Court denial position: Rank 5 of 8 · 50th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.5% · P75 78.6% · IQR 19.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 372
- Any relief granted
- 61.0%
- Denied
- 39.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 49.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -10.0 pp
Court denial position: 17th percentile
Judge outcome spread
12 qualifying direct judges · P25 54.7% · Median 62.0% · P75 70.5% · IQR 15.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 581
- Any relief granted
- 10.2%
- Denied
- 89.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 89.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +0.4 pp
Court denial position: 64th percentile
Judge outcome spread
14 qualifying direct judges · P25 86.9% · Median 89.3% · P75 92.1% · IQR 5.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.