Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 269
- Any relief granted
- 48.3%
- Denied
- 51.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 61.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -9.5 pp
Court denial position: Rank 7 of 8 · 25th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 53.7% · Median 69.6% · P75 80.9% · IQR 27.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,088
- Any relief granted
- 31.5%
- Denied
- 68.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 76.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -8.0 pp
Court denial position: 31st percentile
Judge outcome spread
16 qualifying direct judges · P25 67.9% · Median 76.6% · P75 85.4% · IQR 17.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 111
- Any relief granted
- 0.9%
- Denied
- 99.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 85.8%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +13.3 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 319
- Any relief granted
- 63.9%
- Denied
- 36.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 64.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -28.2 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 305
- Any relief granted
- 10.5%
- Denied
- 89.5%
- Court denial benchmark
- 72.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +17.2 pp
Court denial position: 82nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 71.1% · Median 82.1% · P75 87.5% · IQR 16.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 719
- Any relief granted
- 28.8%
- Denied
- 71.2%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -0.4 pp
Court denial position: 62nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 68.8% · P75 75.9% · IQR 13.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 192
- Any relief granted
- 55.2%
- Denied
- 44.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 46.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -1.3 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 293
- Any relief granted
- 16.7%
- Denied
- 83.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 51.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +31.9 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 709
- Any relief granted
- 22.7%
- Denied
- 77.3%
- Court denial benchmark
- 57.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +19.7 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 8 · 88th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 57.8% · Median 66.4% · P75 74.1% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 110
- Any relief granted
- 19.1%
- Denied
- 80.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.8%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -1.9 pp