Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 230
- Any relief granted
- 9.1%
- Denied
- 90.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +20.8 pp
Court denial position: 80th percentile
Judge outcome spread
15 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.6% · Median 82.9% · P75 90.9% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,809
- Any relief granted
- 14.2%
- Denied
- 85.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 73.9%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.9 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 7 · 86th percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 65.8% · Median 69.2% · P75 83.8% · IQR 18.0%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 830
- Any relief granted
- 6.1%
- Denied
- 93.9%
- Court denial benchmark
- 89.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +4.5 pp
Court denial position: 93rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
14 qualifying direct judges · P25 86.9% · Median 89.3% · P75 92.1% · IQR 5.2%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 897
- Any relief granted
- 10.9%
- Denied
- 89.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +7.1 pp
Court denial position: Rank 2 of 6 · 83rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.1% · Median 85.4% · P75 88.5% · IQR 5.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 126
- Any relief granted
- 4.8%
- Denied
- 95.2%
- Court denial benchmark
- 70.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +25.1 pp
Court denial position: 93rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
15 qualifying direct judges · P25 74.6% · Median 82.9% · P75 90.9% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 470
- Any relief granted
- 22.3%
- Denied
- 77.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 60.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +17.3 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 8 · 75th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.5% · P75 78.6% · IQR 19.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 645
- Any relief granted
- 22.6%
- Denied
- 77.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 72.3%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +5.1 pp
Court denial position: 45th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 71.1% · Median 82.1% · P75 87.5% · IQR 16.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 292
- Any relief granted
- 6.2%
- Denied
- 93.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.8%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.0 pp
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 152
- Any relief granted
- 1.3%
- Denied
- 98.7%
- Court denial benchmark
- 86.1%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +12.6 pp
Court denial position: Rank 1 of 10 · 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
10 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.3% · Median 87.6% · P75 92.4% · IQR 9.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 523
- Any relief granted
- 37.9%
- Denied
- 62.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 71.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -9.5 pp
Court denial position: 31st percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 62.1% · Median 68.8% · P75 75.9% · IQR 13.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.