Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 455
- Any relief granted
- 27.0%
- Denied
- 73.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 57.6%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +15.4 pp
Court denial position: Rank 3 of 8 · 75th percentile
Judge outcome spread
8 qualifying direct judges · P25 57.8% · Median 66.4% · P75 74.1% · IQR 16.3%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 735
- Any relief granted
- 39.2%
- Denied
- 60.8%
- Court denial benchmark
- 49.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.8 pp
Court denial position: 50th percentile
Judge outcome spread
12 qualifying direct judges · P25 54.7% · Median 62.0% · P75 70.5% · IQR 15.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 249
- Any relief granted
- 6.4%
- Denied
- 93.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 84.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +8.9 pp
Court denial position: Rank 1 of 7 · 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
7 qualifying direct judges · P25 78.4% · Median 83.8% · P75 93.1% · IQR 14.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 552
- Any relief granted
- 27.0%
- Denied
- 73.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 65.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +7.6 pp
Court denial position: 62nd percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.1% · P75 80.3% · IQR 20.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 480
- Any relief granted
- 37.9%
- Denied
- 62.1%
- Court denial benchmark
- 65.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -3.3 pp
Court denial position: 38th percentile
Judge outcome spread
13 qualifying direct judges · P25 59.5% · Median 70.1% · P75 80.3% · IQR 20.8%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,051
- Any relief granted
- 34.0%
- Denied
- 66.0%
- Court denial benchmark
- 76.5%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -10.5 pp
Court denial position: 25th percentile
Judge outcome spread
16 qualifying direct judges · P25 67.9% · Median 76.6% · P75 85.4% · IQR 17.5%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 220
- Any relief granted
- 6.4%
- Denied
- 93.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.4%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +11.2 pp
Court denial position: 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
11 qualifying direct judges · P25 79.9% · Median 83.2% · P75 86.8% · IQR 6.9%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 1,105
- Any relief granted
- 50.4%
- Denied
- 49.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 47.7%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +1.9 pp
Court denial position: 25th percentile
Judge outcome spread
36 qualifying direct judges · P25 49.7% · Median 60.5% · P75 72.8% · IQR 23.1%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 583
- Any relief granted
- 9.6%
- Denied
- 90.4%
- Court denial benchmark
- 82.0%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- +8.4 pp
Court denial position: Rank 1 of 6 · 100th percentile
Judge outcome spread
6 qualifying direct judges · P25 83.1% · Median 85.4% · P75 88.5% · IQR 5.4%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.
Direct judge report · TRAC Immigration · Source
- Decisions
- 186
- Any relief granted
- 70.4%
- Denied
- 29.6%
- Court denial benchmark
- 41.2%
- U.S. denial benchmark
- 62.9%
- Outcome difference vs court
- -11.6 pp
Court denial position: Rank 7 of 9 · 33rd percentile
Judge outcome spread
9 qualifying direct judges · P25 29.6% · Median 42.0% · P75 43.3% · IQR 13.7%
Peers are restricted to direct-data judges at the same TRAC report court and reporting period; at least five qualifying judges are required. Tied denial rates share the same competition rank.